sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: Sorcery mirroring (Was: Re: [SM-Discuss] Don't updated todays [snip] sorcery)
- From: Seth Alan Woolley <seth AT positivism.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: Sorcery mirroring (Was: Re: [SM-Discuss] Don't updated todays [snip] sorcery)
- Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:03:17 -0800
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 10:22:16AM -0800, Andrew wrote:
> In a private message:
>
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 07:15:53PM +0100, Eric Schabell wrote:
> > So as we see again, even when you get what you want, it ain't enough...
> >
>
> If you had read my emails on this topic you would have noticed that i
> pointed out that I would need to have access to the mirrors. If nothing
> else because of the way mirroring is done. Im sorry you cannot comphrehend
> my explaination of the security risks inherent in letting just anyone
> be a mirror.
>
> But again, take your flames elsewhere.
>
You're correct. We can't mirror anything unless we have some
confirmation that it's legitimate.
--
Seth Alan Woolley [seth at positivism.org], SPAM/UCE is unauthorized
Key id EF10E21A = 36AD 8A92 8499 8439 E6A8 3724 D437 AF5D EF10 E21A
http://smgl.positivism.org:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEF10E21A
Security Team Leader Source Mage GNU/Linux http://www.sourcemage.org
Attachment:
pgpgxldl8G4aR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Sorcery mirroring (Was: Re: [SM-Discuss] Don't updated todays [snip] sorcery),
Seth Alan Woolley, 11/24/2004
-
Re: Sorcery mirroring (Was: Re: [SM-Discuss] Don't updated todays [snip] sorcery),
Andrew, 11/24/2004
-
Re: Sorcery mirroring (Was: Re: [SM-Discuss] Don't updated todays [snip] sorcery),
Eric Schabell, 11/24/2004
-
Re: Sorcery mirroring (Was: Re: [SM-Discuss] Don't updated todays [snip] sorcery),
Andrew, 11/24/2004
- Re: Sorcery mirroring (Was: Re: [SM-Discuss] Don't updated todays [snip] sorcery), Seth Alan Woolley, 11/24/2004
-
Re: Sorcery mirroring (Was: Re: [SM-Discuss] Don't updated todays [snip] sorcery),
Bas van Gils, 11/24/2004
-
Re: Sorcery mirroring (Was: Re: [SM-Discuss] Don't updated todays [snip] sorcery),
Seth Alan Woolley, 11/24/2004
- Re: Sorcery mirroring (Was: Re: [SM-Discuss] Don't updated todays [snip] sorcery), Bas van Gils, 11/25/2004
-
Re: Sorcery mirroring (Was: Re: [SM-Discuss] Don't updated todays [snip] sorcery),
Seth Alan Woolley, 11/24/2004
-
Re: Sorcery mirroring (Was: Re: [SM-Discuss] Don't updated todays [snip] sorcery),
Andrew, 11/24/2004
-
Re: Sorcery mirroring (Was: Re: [SM-Discuss] Don't updated todays [snip] sorcery),
Seth Alan Woolley, 11/24/2004
-
Re: Sorcery mirroring (Was: Re: [SM-Discuss] Don't updated todays [snip] sorcery),
David Kowis, 11/24/2004
- Re: Sorcery mirroring (Was: Re: [SM-Discuss] Don't updated todays [snip] sorcery), Thomas HOUSSIN, 11/26/2004
-
Re: Sorcery mirroring (Was: Re: [SM-Discuss] Don't updated todays [snip] sorcery),
David Kowis, 11/24/2004
-
Re: Sorcery mirroring (Was: Re: [SM-Discuss] Don't updated todays [snip] sorcery),
Eric Schabell, 11/24/2004
-
Re: Sorcery mirroring (Was: Re: [SM-Discuss] Don't updated todays [snip] sorcery),
Andrew, 11/24/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.