sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional rpmunpack
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:16:58 -0700
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 10:42:06AM -0700, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Quoting Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>:
> > Sure theres not really any sorcery problems so long as the spells that
> > needed them properly listed the depends.
> >
> > We'd need to remove them from the basesystem spell, iso and sustained
> > list.
>
> I've done the following changes (devel changes have been integrated into
> test):
>
> * The following spells now depend on rpmunpack:
> devel/test:
> archive/cksfv
> archive/rpm
> archive/zoo
> libs/newt
> z-rejected:
> z-devel/sybase-ase
> z-devel/sybase-doc
> z-devel/sybase-ocsd
> z-utils/scim-chinese
>
> * rpmunpack has been removed from basesystem/DEPENDS.
> * Removed rpmunpack from
> http://wiki.sourcemage.org/index.php?page=BaseSystem
> (if anyone cares to update this for the latest ISO, please do ;)).
>
I'll remove it from the sustained list so everyone can dispel rpmunpack
without needing --nosustain
-Andrew
-
[SM-Discuss] Optional rpmunpack,
Eric Sandall, 10/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional rpmunpack,
Andrew, 10/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional rpmunpack,
Eric Sandall, 10/18/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional rpmunpack, Andrew, 10/18/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional rpmunpack,
Eric Sandall, 10/18/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional rpmunpack,
Andrew, 10/10/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.