sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] emacs not using X : Solved
- Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 14:46:02 -0700
Quoting Paul Mahon <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>:
> I thought the policy was not to include X as a dependency... perhaps I'm
> just out of date though.
IIRC we only include X dependency if it's needed/optional at compile time
/and/
none of the package's dependencies implicitly or explicitly depend on X
already.
In this case (emacs) it has no DEPENDS file and so an optional_depends on
X11-LIBS (unless it needs -SERVER) would be okay, IIRC.
-sandalle
--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] emacs not using X : Solved,
Rohan Nicholls, 08/06/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] emacs not using X : Solved,
Eric Sandall, 08/06/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] emacs not using X : Solved,
Paul Mahon, 08/06/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] emacs not using X : Solved, Seth Alan Woolley, 08/06/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] emacs not using X : Solved, Eric Sandall, 08/06/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] emacs not using X : Solved,
Paul Mahon, 08/06/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] emacs not using X : Solved,
Eric Sandall, 08/06/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.