sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Paul Mahon <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- To: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] emacs not using X : Solved
- Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 16:07:53 -0400
I thought the policy was not to include X as a dependency... perhaps I'm
just out of date though.
On Fri, 2004-06-08 at 08:43 -0700, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Quoting Rohan Nicholls <rohan.nicholls AT pareto.nl>:
> > Oops,
> >
> > Well I guess I must have compiled it the first time before having xorg
> > isntalled (probably to have a nice console environment to work in).
> > Having recompiled it has found X and it happy.
> >
> > Am now happy with fully functional emacs. :-D
>
> Perhaps emacs should have an `optional_depends X11-SERVER`? Or would it
> just
> need X11-LIBS?
>
> -sandalle
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] emacs not using X : Solved,
Rohan Nicholls, 08/06/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] emacs not using X : Solved,
Eric Sandall, 08/06/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] emacs not using X : Solved,
Paul Mahon, 08/06/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] emacs not using X : Solved, Seth Alan Woolley, 08/06/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] emacs not using X : Solved, Eric Sandall, 08/06/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] emacs not using X : Solved,
Paul Mahon, 08/06/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] emacs not using X : Solved,
Eric Sandall, 08/06/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.