sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
- To: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO suggestion
- Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 08:23:35 -0700
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 11:16:34AM -0400, Jeremy Kolb wrote:
> Quoting Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>:
> >
> > The problem with this (while it would be nice for some) is that many use
> > SMGL
> > because it doesn't install much in the beginning. ;) However, you do say
> > that
> > xorg could be optional (such as the NFS and SSH installs), but that would
> > increase the ISO size quite a bit.
> >
> > I am not necessary against this as it would be a "nice" feature, but
> > others
> > may
> > not like it.
> >
> > What do people think of adding xorg (and only xorg, not xfree86) and,
> > say,
> > blackbox (it's small and fast) as an optional install?
> >
> > -sandalle
> >
> > --
> > Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
> > eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
> > http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
> > http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Discuss mailing list
> > SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
> >
>
>
> I like having a minimal iso. When you add X you have to make sure it's
> configured correctly and it adds a lot of stuff to the iso. It also adds
> more
> room for problems.
>
> Jeremy
>
I agree, keep the iso small. We do have net based installs in the
development queue which would involve downloading the cache tarballs
from the web, and having only a small iso or floppy image to boot from,
at which point adding xorg and a wm as an optional package would be
cheaper as it wouldn't unnecessarily bloat the iso.
Perhaps as a compromise we can add a note to the install wiki
"if you really need to get work done, you might want to install X + a wm
before embarking on the update/rebuild."
-
[SM-Discuss] ISO suggestion,
Rohan Nicholls, 08/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO suggestion,
Eric Sandall, 08/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO suggestion,
Jeremy Kolb, 08/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO suggestion,
Andrew, 08/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO suggestion,
Eric Sandall, 08/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO suggestion,
Rohan Nicholls, 08/05/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO suggestion,
Eric Sandall, 08/05/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO suggestion, ner0x, 08/05/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO suggestion, Eric Sandall, 08/05/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO suggestion, ner0x, 08/05/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO suggestion, Eric Sandall, 08/05/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO suggestion,
Eric Sandall, 08/05/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO suggestion,
Rohan Nicholls, 08/05/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO suggestion,
Eric Sandall, 08/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO suggestion,
Andrew, 08/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO suggestion,
Jeremy Kolb, 08/04/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO suggestion, unet, 08/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO suggestion,
Eric Sandall, 08/04/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO suggestion, Mads Laursen, 08/05/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.