sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Damien Mascord <tusker AT tusker.org>
- To: Jackson Alley <jalley AT toomanymirrors.homelinux.com>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] statically linked bash?
- Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:00:33 +0800
Jackson Alley wrote:
Do we have a list of what spells will install staticly? I've had several
users ask me what can be installed staticly and if there is a way to have a
spell always compile staticly w/o having to use the sorcery option?
Sorcery option ? There is a sorcery option? :)
The only way that I've done it is by adding stuff to the "configure options" (ie, --static, or --enable-static, or whatever the particular spell uses).
Since static things require other static things, it really makes depedancy stuff quite ugly, since you have to figure it out yourself.
Ideally, I would really like a "static" flag, that can be used within depends, so that you can build a particular spell as static, and it will build all the "dependancies above it" as static as well.
Each spell would have to be modified that allows a static build, and slowly change all the spells to be able to build in a static (and shared) way.
Anyway, hope what I am saying is clear to some degree, or at least opaque.
Damien
--
Damien Mascord (tusker at tusker dot org)
GPG key 2CB181BE / 93B2 EF21 0C7C F022 F467 7966 219E 92B3 2CB1 81BE
-
[SM-Discuss] statically linked bash?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/29/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] statically linked bash?, Eric Sandall, 07/29/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] statically linked bash?,
dufflebunk, 07/29/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] statically linked bash?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/29/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] statically linked bash?,
Jackson Alley, 07/29/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] statically linked bash?,
Damien Mascord, 07/29/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] statically linked bash?, Andrew, 07/29/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] statically linked bash?,
Damien Mascord, 07/29/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] statically linked bash?,
Jackson Alley, 07/29/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] statically linked bash?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/29/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.