Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - [SM-Discuss] statically linked bash?

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [SM-Discuss] statically linked bash?
  • Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:07:25 +0200

Hi,

I just updated readline and bash in the devel grimoire and while doing
this totally broke my readline install which left me with no working
shell on my system. Luckily i managed to recover from that using a
static busybox i got from a rpm on the web, but it made me wonder why we
don't install a static bash binary in addition to the dynamic one
anymore. I know we used to do that, and I think it's a nice fallback for
such problems. Does anyone remember why we removed that from the bash
spell?

--
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
http://www.sourcemage.org




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page