Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Paul <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>]

You could make a new grimoire for emacs... then I wouldn 't have to have
all the useless emacs spells on my computer... ;)


PS, Emacs 5uck0rz!
hee hee

On Sat, 2004-19-06 at 18:48 +0200, Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 09:32:14AM -0700, Eric Sandall wrote:
> > Quoting Eric Schabell <eschabell AT sourcemage.org>:
> > > On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 12:38:34PM +0200, Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > we have a volunteer for a new section apps-emacs (see bug 6999[1]).
> > > > I think it's a good idea to have a new section for emacs based apps if
> > > > there are that many, just want to get some input whether people agree
> > > > and what the name of the section should be.
> > > > 
> > > This is a dangerous path... how far are we going to keep splitting? the
> > > apps name suggests apps-* 
> > > 
> > > I already hate having to search for the correct section in audio-* and
> > > video-* and x11-* and ftp-* and chat-*
> > > 
> > > I am against this from the beginning... I like simplicity (KISS) so
> > > would rather have large sections than multiple sections (unknown and/or
> > > un-rememberable for me).
> > 
> > Good point.
> > 
> > Perhaps baux should help Pieter with the editors section and just put the 
> > spells
> > in there? That would about double the editors numbers, but with two 
> > people that
> > wouldn't be too bad.
>  
> I guess most of them wouldn't go to editors, but rather to chat-irc,
> mail, news and other sections. Of course it's possible to do that, but
> makes it a bit harder to have them maintained by one person.
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part