sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Jason Flatt <jason AT flattfamily.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Discuss] Spam Proofing . . .
- Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 07:05:13 -0700
For all of the developers who are tired of receiving porn, pharmaceutical and
other notices, I would like to change The Source Mage Developers [0] Wiki
page, modifying the e-mail addresses so they are not easy for spammers to
scavenge. If you want to keep receiving those notices, just let me know and
I'll leave your e-mail address alone.
The reason I am posting this is because we will lose the ability to just
click
on an e-mail address and have a new e-mail message pop open with the e-mail
address already entered in the To: field. Personally, I'm okay with manually
typing to reduce the spam.
It seems we have two ways of doing it: 1) the entire e-mail address as one
long word with the @ and the . converted to something like_AT_ and _DOT_ (as
Andrew as done for his e-mail addresses -- I followed his lead), or 2) each
piece separated by a space. The advantage of using method 1 is that we can
still do the instant e-mail message trick, but we will have to convert the
_AT_ and _DOT_ (or whatever) back to their appropriate symbols. The
advantage of using method number 2 is we can do a direct copy and paste and
remove the spaces.
Unless there is a better way that I have not thought of, I think converting
all the e-mail addresses to the method 1 format is what I will do. Let me
know.
Also, I'm not sure about this, should Jabber addresses be converted also, or
are they resistant to spam?
[0] http://wiki.sourcemage.org/index.php?page=The+Source+Mage+Developers
--
Jason Flatt (jason @ flattfamily . com)
Father of five (http://www.flattfamily.com/)
Linux user (http://www.sourcemage.org/)
IRC Nick: Oadae Channels: #sourcemage, #lvlug Server: irc.freenode.net
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS/IT d(-) s+:- a>++++ C++$(+++) UL++++ P(+) L+++ E- W++ N+@ o? K? w-- O?
M-- V PS- PE+ Y+ PGP@ t 5+ X R tv--() b+@ DI+@ D+++ G e h---- r+++ y++++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
-
[SM-Discuss] Spam Proofing . . .,
Jason Flatt, 06/19/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Spam Proofing . . ., Arwed von Merkatz, 06/19/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Spam Proofing . . ., Eric Sandall, 06/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Spam Proofing . . .,
Jason Flatt, 06/19/2004
-
RE: [SM-Discuss] Spam Proofing . . .,
David Kowis, 06/19/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Spam Proofing . . ., Jason Flatt, 06/19/2004
-
RE: [SM-Discuss] Spam Proofing . . .,
David Kowis, 06/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Spam Proofing . . .,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/20/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Spam Proofing . . .,
Paul, 06/20/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Spam Proofing . . ., Jason Flatt, 06/20/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Spam Proofing . . .,
Arwed von Merkatz, 06/20/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Spam Proofing . . ., Jason Flatt, 06/20/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Spam Proofing . . .,
Paul, 06/20/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.