sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Jason Flatt <jason AT flattfamily.com>
- To: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Cleanse in Stable
- Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 20:20:23 -0700
On Thursday 20 May 2004 12:19 pm, Andrew wrote:
>
> We cannot implement upgrade hooks between now and the time we'd like
> to have the next sorcery release (and they wouldn't work until the next
> update after that anyway). In a perfect world this would solve the
> problem. So thus, using them to solve the cleanse issue is not feasable.
Why not have an interim release that includes the hooks only? I realize that
this would be a major logistics nightmare, but I was just curious.
> So we're going with this temporary hacked in fix to run cleanse on the
> first time cast is run (after the update). The hack is for this release
> only and will be removed for the next major sorcery release.
Am I right to ASSuME that the code which makes this happen is somehow removed
after the first cast/cleanse run or will it just keep checking for some new
variable stored in one of the config files?
--
Jason Flatt (jason @ flattfamily . com)
Father of five (http://www.flattfamily.com/)
Linux user (http://www.sourcemage.org/)
IRC Nick: Oadae Channels: #sourcemage, #lvlug Server: irc.freenode.net
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS/IT d(-) s+:- a>++++ C++$(+++) UL++++ P(+) L+++ E- W++ N+@ o? K? w-- O?
M-- V PS- PE+ Y+ PGP@ t 5+ X R tv--() b+@ DI+@ D+++ G e h---- r+++ y++++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
-
[SM-Discuss] Cleanse in Stable,
Paul, 05/20/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cleanse in Stable,
Andrew, 05/20/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Cleanse in Stable, Eric Sandall, 05/20/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cleanse in Stable,
Jason Flatt, 05/20/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Cleanse in Stable, Andrew, 05/20/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cleanse in Stable,
Andrew, 05/20/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.