sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: The story of
- Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 09:44:38 -0700
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 02:10:07PM -0000, evraire AT tuwg.com wrote:
>
> > Pretty much, yep. Also of note would be if you do force the dispelling of
> > Y, and
> > X stays (or even if it doesn't), and then something comes along to be
> > cast that
> > indirectly depends on Y, then Y should be recast, but this would slow
> > things
> > down as Sorcery would have to check every direct and indirect dependency.
>
> Along the same lines, if X /optionally/ depends on Y, and you dispel Y it
> should not only inform you that X currently depends on it, but that it
> optionally does, and if you choose to force Y it should prompt to recompile
> X without the optional depends Y.
Im not sure if Im supposed to laugh or cry watching you guys wander into
my world and rediscover all the details of next generation dependency
hacking.
-Andrew
-
RE: Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: The story of,
evraire, 05/19/2004
- Re: Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: The story of, Andrew, 05/19/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.