Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 3 Apr 2004 02:45, Mathieu L wrote:
> > could I ask that you stop renaming the threads ? please ?
> > I assumed it was because you were subscribed to the digest version, but
> > even if you are please use the original subject.
> >  Having a single thread renamed into 4 threads is not helpful for the
> > archives (or me reading my mail now).
>
> -->Really sorry about that, I indeed only read the digest and Sandalle told
> me once I shouldn't let something like ¨Re: SM-Discuss Digest...¨ so I have
> taken the bad habit to rename into something more explicit each time. Be
> assured that I won't do it anymore, promess. :-)
> Should I add a ¨Re:¨ each time I reply or should there be always only one,
> to be conform to the archives classification? (I have anyway to write the
> subject by myself since when hitting reply I have this ¨Re: SM-Discuss
> Digest...¨ ).
>
> /Lejatorn.
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> We are Microsoft.  Linux is irrelevant.
> Openness is futile.  Prepare to be assimilated.
> ------------------------------------------------
Yes just change the subject from 
Re: SM-Discuss Digest.. 
to 
Re:<original subject> (not sure if you need to add [SM-Discuss] between Re: 
and <subject>, I am sure you will figure it out though)
the digest still says what each emails original subject was, and then anyone 
interested in that particular thread, knows that you are replying to that 
thread. Once today/yesterday (damn internet messes with timezones !) someone 
replied to one of your emails thinking it was  a new subject, not a 
continuation of the "Requests for ISO" thread.
Sorry if it seems like I am coming down on you, I hope it doesn't traumatise 
you for life :-)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAbZrs8fSufZR6424RAt16AJsFx4c0vLWTRYSsEKejL1bMBvbDtgCfdnd8
PD0gxTzgHLyuuTKXSbpckSc=
=apbv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----