sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Casey Harkins <charkins AT upl.cs.wisc.edu>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO
- Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 10:51:21 -0600 (CST)
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Seth Alan Woolley wrote:
> Note for the future:
>
> And you mentioned the perl dependency for linux ... I'd like to have the
> option to not have perl in the basesystem. In fact maybe we need to
> make a distinction between "runtime_depends" and "build_depends" if it's
> not both. That way it could cast (as in resurrect if already built)
> perl, build linux, and then dispel perl when the last spell that needed
> it in the install list completed (while optionally keeping a cache
> laying around). If we wanted to have more fun, gcc itself could be
> eliminated in that way and only resurrected for stuff that needed it.
> This would make it really easy to copy a bunch of caches over and since
> most stuff doesn't need a runtime_depends on the full gcc, we could make
> zaurus/embedded/server ports really easy. runtime_depends don't have to
> be dependency ordered during building, as well. Anybody following me?
>
I like this idea. As sorcery gains support for reliably sharing cache
files across a network, a full development environment on some machines
will be unnecessary (and possibly undesired).
-casey
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Vladimír Marek, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Robert Helgesson, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Eric Sandall, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Seth Alan Woolley, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Casey Harkins, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Craig Van Tassle, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Jason Flatt, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Eric Sandall, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Derek Moyes, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Arwed von Merkatz, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Jose Bernardo Silva, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Vladimír Marek, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Robert Helgesson, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Vladimír Marek, 04/01/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.