Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 3 Apr 2004 03:06, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Quoting Mathieu L <lejatorn AT linuxmail.org>:
> > > could I ask that you stop renaming the threads ? please ?
> > > I assumed it was because you were subscribed to the digest version, but
> >
> > even
> >
> > > if you are please use the original subject.
> > >  Having a single thread renamed into 4 threads is not helpful for the
> >
> > archives
> >
> > > (or me reading my mail now).
> >
> > -->Really sorry about that, I indeed only read the digest and Sandalle
> > told me once I shouldn't let something like ¨Re: SM-Discuss Digest...¨ so
> > I have taken the bad habit to rename into something more explicit each
> > time. Be assured that I won't do it anymore, promess. :-)
> > Should I add a ¨Re:¨ each time I reply or should there be always only
> > one, to be conform to the archives classification? (I have anyway to
> > write the subject by myself since when hitting reply I have this ¨Re:
> > SM-Discuss Digest...¨ ).
> >
> > /Lejatorn.
>
> I'm not sure if you can keep the thread unbroken when using digests; I
> believe that's one of the "drawbacks" of using digest mode. ;( The best
> method may be for you to rename the subject with "Re: <subject>" where
> <subject> is what the subject is on the discussion you're replying to.
>
> -sandalle

Yes I think that is how it needs to be done.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAbZ4Y8fSufZR6424RAgs8AJ4h8cRq46kfQec711g2/WiI8yRyYwCfZJ92
SisfXgZ+nfgnnXnlGqhy12I=
=IZGx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----