Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Jeremy Kolb <jkolb AT brandeis.edu>]

Anyone have any ideas?

On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 19:14, Jeremy Kolb wrote:
> I've recompiled my binutils and gcc against my nptl glibc but there's no
> difference, my gcc is still broken.
> 
> Jeremy
> 
> On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 11:18, Eric Sandall wrote:
> > Quoting Wolfgang Scheicher <worf AT sbox.tu-graz.ac.at>:
> > > That was me, and as far as i suspect that you get a broken gcc if you 
> > > compile
> > > 
> > > gcc on a system with a nptl glibc. Too broken to compile any glibc.
> > > 
> > > Luckily, i had a working gcc in a other pc's /var/cache/sorcery
> > > 
> > > Attached a small test file by rycee which uses this visibility 
> > > attribute.
> > > 
> > > Note: this is propably not the only problem, i couldn't compile qt 
> > > either.
> > > 
> > > How can this be fixed? Eventually we have to use a prerelease snapshot 
> > > of gcc
> > > 
> > > too, if we use one for glibc :-)
> > > 
> > > Worf
> > 
> > I have gcc compiled against glibc+NPTL on 5 machines and have never seen 
> > this
> > problem on any of them. I think the problem might lie elsewhere, but I 
> > have no
> > idea. Have you groked the compile log for gcc and glibc looking for 
> > anything
> > related?
> > 
> > -sandalle
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss