Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc error

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Jeremy Kolb <jkolb AT brandeis.edu>
  • To: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
  • Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc error
  • Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:29:35 -0500

Anyone have any ideas?

On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 19:14, Jeremy Kolb wrote:
> I've recompiled my binutils and gcc against my nptl glibc but there's no
> difference, my gcc is still broken.
>
> Jeremy
>
> On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 11:18, Eric Sandall wrote:
> > Quoting Wolfgang Scheicher <worf AT sbox.tu-graz.ac.at>:
> > > That was me, and as far as i suspect that you get a broken gcc if you
> > > compile
> > >
> > > gcc on a system with a nptl glibc. Too broken to compile any glibc.
> > >
> > > Luckily, i had a working gcc in a other pc's /var/cache/sorcery
> > >
> > > Attached a small test file by rycee which uses this visibility
> > > attribute.
> > >
> > > Note: this is propably not the only problem, i couldn't compile qt
> > > either.
> > >
> > > How can this be fixed? Eventually we have to use a prerelease snapshot
> > > of gcc
> > >
> > > too, if we use one for glibc :-)
> > >
> > > Worf
> >
> > I have gcc compiled against glibc+NPTL on 5 machines and have never seen
> > this
> > problem on any of them. I think the problem might lie elsewhere, but I
> > have no
> > idea. Have you groked the compile log for gcc and glibc looking for
> > anything
> > related?
> >
> > -sandalle
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page