Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc error

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Jeremy Kolb <jkolb AT brandeis.edu>
  • To: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
  • Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc error
  • Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 19:14:45 -0500

I've recompiled my binutils and gcc against my nptl glibc but there's no
difference, my gcc is still broken.

Jeremy

On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 11:18, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Quoting Wolfgang Scheicher <worf AT sbox.tu-graz.ac.at>:
> > That was me, and as far as i suspect that you get a broken gcc if you
> > compile
> >
> > gcc on a system with a nptl glibc. Too broken to compile any glibc.
> >
> > Luckily, i had a working gcc in a other pc's /var/cache/sorcery
> >
> > Attached a small test file by rycee which uses this visibility attribute.
> >
> > Note: this is propably not the only problem, i couldn't compile qt either.
> >
> > How can this be fixed? Eventually we have to use a prerelease snapshot of
> > gcc
> >
> > too, if we use one for glibc :-)
> >
> > Worf
>
> I have gcc compiled against glibc+NPTL on 5 machines and have never seen
> this
> problem on any of them. I think the problem might lie elsewhere, but I have
> no
> idea. Have you groked the compile log for gcc and glibc looking for anything
> related?
>
> -sandalle





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page