Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Jeremy Kolb <jkolb AT brandeis.edu>]

I've recompiled my binutils and gcc against my nptl glibc but there's no
difference, my gcc is still broken.

Jeremy

On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 11:18, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Quoting Wolfgang Scheicher <worf AT sbox.tu-graz.ac.at>:
> > That was me, and as far as i suspect that you get a broken gcc if you 
> > compile
> > 
> > gcc on a system with a nptl glibc. Too broken to compile any glibc.
> > 
> > Luckily, i had a working gcc in a other pc's /var/cache/sorcery
> > 
> > Attached a small test file by rycee which uses this visibility attribute.
> > 
> > Note: this is propably not the only problem, i couldn't compile qt either.
> > 
> > How can this be fixed? Eventually we have to use a prerelease snapshot of 
> > gcc
> > 
> > too, if we use one for glibc :-)
> > 
> > Worf
> 
> I have gcc compiled against glibc+NPTL on 5 machines and have never seen 
> this
> problem on any of them. I think the problem might lie elsewhere, but I have 
> no
> idea. Have you groked the compile log for gcc and glibc looking for anything
> related?
> 
> -sandalle