sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Martin Ruderer <martin AT lddd.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Cc: eric AT sandall.us
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead vote
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 19:14:32 +0100
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 08:16:45 -0800
Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us> wrote:
> Alright, just so that we do this by the book. ;)
>
> Nominations (that I know of) for Sorcery Lead starting in April are
> (is ;)): Andrew Stitt (afrayedknot)
>
> I would like all developers to send in their vote, which I will tally
> at the end of 72 hours (please CC me so that it's easier ;)). This
> vote is a "yes/no" vote for Andrew.
Yes.
But what would happen if most of the developers were against him?
Will we just force Erics to stay in his position as team lead? ;-)
> Shall we take any more nominations while this goes on?
That would be rather stupid (and unfair) I think.
--
Martin
-
[SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead vote,
Eric Sandall, 03/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead vote,
Eric Schabell, 03/16/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead vote, Eric Sandall, 03/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead vote,
Martin Ruderer, 03/16/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead vote, Eric Sandall, 03/16/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead vote, -={|TooManyMirrors|}=-, 03/16/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead vote, Seth Alan Woolley, 03/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead vote,
Jason Flatt, 03/16/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead vote, Andrew, 03/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead vote,
Eric Sandall, 03/17/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead vote, Jason Flatt, 03/17/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead vote, Casey Harkins, 03/17/2004
-
Re: [smgl] [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead vote,
Treeve Jelbert, 03/18/2004
- Re: [smgl] [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead vote, Tony Smith, 03/18/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead vote,
Eric Schabell, 03/16/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.