sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Developer Meeting on 2003-03-07
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 23:58:59 +1100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 21:15, Ladislav Hagara wrote:
> > Agreement from the developers that it is a good thing and necessary,
> > could turn that "should" into a "must".
>
> There is a problem. You can not give orders. SMGL is not their paid full
> time job.
>
> SMGL must be fun for them. We need more developers/active users.
I waited a few days, hoping this would get more of a run for its money.
Lace I agree with almost all of what you have said, but respectfully think
you
might be looking at this particular problem backwards.
To adequately maintain a section a guru needs to receive the perforce
notifications for that section. They need to know what has been done and by
whom or by definition, they are not "maintaining" anything at all. Neither
you nor I would attempt to maintain a section without this knowledge and
neither any of our more respected developers.
If someone offers to maintain a section but won't subscribe to these perforce
notifications, then there application for section maintenace must be refused,
they would be accepted as a general guru or as someone's assistant but they
can't maintain a section without knowledge of events within that section.
This is a common sense issue (some have it some don't) , I am definitely not
trying to stop people from volunteering by smothering their freedoms or
creativity or tangling them up in redtape.
Volunteering to help in any section would be accepted, but without knowledge
of the sections changes (via perforce notifications) the title "maintainer"
is meaningless or empty and shouldn't be granted.
Hamish
ps I will stop trying to explain things logically some day soon, old habits
die hard for me, so despite the fact I have been burned badly and am leaving
I still want the best for the project and can't sit silently.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAUGKT8fSufZR6424RAqZwAJ0YVx5U9ggFRiBZw7wL4GHiP/wcagCfaQYr
+RIye8w1jfwzDLjMBH9PlUY=
=bRjq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Discuss] Developer Meeting on 2003-03-07,
Eric Sandall, 03/07/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developer Meeting on 2003-03-07,
Hamish Greig, 03/07/2004
-
Message not available
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Developer Meeting on 2003-03-07, Hamish Greig, 03/08/2004
-
Message not available
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developer Meeting on 2003-03-07,
Eric Sandall, 03/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developer Meeting on 2003-03-07,
Hamish Greig, 03/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developer Meeting on 2003-03-07,
Ladislav Hagara, 03/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developer Meeting on 2003-03-07,
Hamish Greig, 03/11/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Developer Meeting on 2003-03-07, Eric Sandall, 03/11/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developer Meeting on 2003-03-07,
Hamish Greig, 03/11/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developer Meeting on 2003-03-07,
Ladislav Hagara, 03/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developer Meeting on 2003-03-07,
Hamish Greig, 03/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Developer Meeting on 2003-03-07,
Hamish Greig, 03/07/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.