sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] thoughts about default kernel branch (moving to2.6.xsomewhen)
- From: Jason Flatt <jason AT flattfamily.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] thoughts about default kernel branch (moving to2.6.xsomewhen)
- Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 20:26:27 -0800
On Tuesday 09 March 2004 7:12 am, Ladislav Hagara wrote:
> > When I cast it from devel, which I did several times this last weekend,
> > the default is still 2.4.25
>
> Devel grimoire ?
> From perforce ?
>
> Perforce seems O.K.
>
> $ diff -r devel/kernels/ test/kernels/
> $ diff -r test/kernels/ stable/kernels/
> diff -r test/kernels/linux/DETAILS stable/kernels/linux/DETAILS
> < VERSION=2.6.3
> ---
>
> > VERSION=2.4.25
>
> Just download http://codex.sourcemage.org/test.tar.bz2 and it really
> contains DETAILS with VERSION=2.4.25.
>
> Some problems with packaging script ?
Well I guess it's OK now. Distrowatch has 2.6.3 as the current version and
gaze versions shows 2.6.3. I was just getting 2.4.25 as the default when I
cast the spell, and I expected the default to be 2.6.3.
--
Jason Flatt (jason @ flattfamily . com)
Father of five (http://www.flattfamily.com/)
Linux user (http://www.sourcemage.org/)
IRC Nick: Oadae Channels: #sourcemage, #lvlug Server: irc.freenode.net
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] thoughts about default kernel branch (moving to 2.6.x somewhen),
Jason Flatt, 03/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] thoughts about default kernel branch (moving to2.6.x somewhen),
Ladislav Hagara, 03/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] thoughts about default kernel branch (moving to2.6.x somewhen),
Jason Flatt, 03/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] thoughts about default kernel branch (moving to2.6.xsomewhen),
Ladislav Hagara, 03/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] thoughts about default kernel branch (moving to2.6.xsomewhen),
Jason Flatt, 03/09/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] thoughts about default kernel branch (moving to2.6.xsomewhen), Andrew, 03/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] thoughts about default kernel branch (moving to2.6.xsomewhen),
Jason Flatt, 03/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] thoughts about default kernel branch (moving to2.6.xsomewhen),
Ladislav Hagara, 03/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] thoughts about default kernel branch (moving to2.6.x somewhen),
Jason Flatt, 03/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] thoughts about default kernel branch (moving to2.6.x somewhen),
Ladislav Hagara, 03/09/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.