Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: [SM-Users] tinderboxes

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org, Source Mage - Grimoire <sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org>, Source Mage - Users <sm-users AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Cc:
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: [SM-Users] tinderboxes
  • Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 20:19:33 -0700

>
> I had thought to use tinderboxes purely to test software, the wetware and
> UI
> problem with sorcery i see as a different issue. Having said that i do see
> how it could be used to report bugs for sorcery, but it would be hard to
> simulate the stupidity of some people... Should we really try to do that or
> should we help the sorcery team idiot-proof their code some other way ?
>

I guess im not doing a good job explaining myself. Im not really talking
about idiot-proofness. More along the lines of some newbie out there
wants to install some number of spells and following the instructions
types cast <list>, then proceeds to let all the defaults go by (or
something). There arent many real problems with sorcery at this point,
at least very few that a tinderbox the way I think we are envisioning
it can catch. What I think we are after is making sure spells install
properly under different conditions, which we as developers cant always
catch since we dont have the time to test our spells manually on n
different setups.

Anyone else interested? How about that irc design meeting?




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page