sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Removing aged cache and spool files
- From: Derek Moyes <sorcerer AT flamesnyper.com>
- To: Robin <robin AT kallisti.2y.net>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Removing aged cache and spool files
- Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 16:50:12 -0500
We'd need some way of _not_ deleting any currently installed packages, no
matter
how old they are, though.
Quoting Robin <robin AT kallisti.2y.net>:
> I'm wondering if it may not be a bad idea to (optionally of course)
> remove files that are older than a certain time, say 128 days, from
> /var/spool/sorcery and /var/cache/sorcery. This could end up saving a
> good bit of space whilst ideally not causing anything to break.
> Perhaps this could be done on a system-update, with a simple
> "find $dir -mtime +180".
>
> Is there a reason not to do this? (I just had a glance at mine, and I
> think it would save a fair bit of space)
>
> --
> Robin <robin AT kallisti.2y.net> JabberID:
> <eythian AT jabber.org>
-- Derek Moyes
-- sorcerer AT flamesnyper.com
-- dmoney on #sourcemage
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Removing aged cache and spool files,
Derek Moyes, 07/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Removing aged cache and spool files,
Hamish Greig, 07/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Removing aged cache and spool files,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 07/04/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Removing aged cache and spool files,
Hamish Greig, 07/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Removing aged cache and spool files, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 07/04/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Removing aged cache and spool files,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 07/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Removing aged cache and spool files, Eric Sandall, 07/07/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Removing aged cache and spool files,
Hamish Greig, 07/04/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Removing aged cache and spool files,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 07/04/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Removing aged cache and spool files,
Hamish Greig, 07/03/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.