sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
- To: Source Mage - Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] timing compiles
- Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 07:46:49 -0800
how about we add a feature to let us read our email too? *duck*
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:30:57PM +0000, Jack Bertram wrote:
> It's just occurred to me that it would be quite interesting to have an
> idea (before casting a spell) of how long it's going to take to cast.
> Now, it seems unrealistic to maintain this centrally since everyone
> compiles on different machines. However, there's no reason why sorcery
> couldn't time each compile on a local machine and store the elapsed time
> in a database. Then I'd have a good idea of how long it took to upgrade
> a spell:
>
> Something like:
>
> $ gaze time glibc
>
> glibc compile time:
> version time (s)
> ----------------
> 2.2.6 89241
> 2.3.1 91324
>
> Then I could expect a new compile to take just over a day.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> jack
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
-
[SM-Discuss] timing compiles,
Jack Bertram, 02/07/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] timing compiles, Andrew, 02/07/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] timing compiles,
Alan Ross, 02/07/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] timing compiles, Seth Woolley, 02/08/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] timing compiles, Alan Ross, 02/07/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] timing compiles,
Jimmy Yen(???), 02/08/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] timing compiles, Dufflebunk, 02/08/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.