sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] How important are autoconf and automake?
- From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] How important are autoconf and automake?
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 21:39:39 +0100
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 07:55:30PM +0000, Jose Bernardo Silva wrote:
> --- Michael Taylor <tcm AT adelphia.net> wrote: > Should
> they be restored after something dispels them
> > as conflicting?
>
> I'd think so, as a lot of packages need them, and they
> are not in most DEPENDS lists.
If a spell needs autoconf/automake to build it has to be in the DEPENDS
file, if not it's a bug.
That's what resurrection is for, if a spell dispels them because of
CONFLICTS, the next one depending on them will cause them to be
resurrected.
--
Arwed
aka alley_cat
-
[SM-Discuss] How important are autoconf and automake?,
Michael Taylor, 12/16/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] How important are autoconf and automake?,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 12/16/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] How important are autoconf and automake?, Arwed von Merkatz, 12/16/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] How important are autoconf and automake?,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 12/16/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.