sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Mark Andrews <msasgl AT msa-enterprises.com>
- To: Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>, SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re[3]: [SM-Discuss] sorcery purists do not read!
- Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:14:08 +0000
Hello All,
Monday, December 9, 2002, 3:32:27 PM, you wrote:
>>> Like my ua command which does an extension based (recursive)
>>> unarchive command - so things like
>>>
>>> ua -d /directory file1.tar.gz file2.patch.bz2
>>>
>>> produce a patched source directory.
>>> The plan is that the bzip2 spell manages it's entry in the
>>> ua command and so on..
D>> Hmm, interesting.
MA> The machines at home at the moment, but I'll bring a copy of
MA> this tomorrow.
And here it is 8-)
http://www.msa-enterprises.com/deepdesk/dd.tar.bz2
Contains ua and lu commands for zsh. Just put them in
/usr/share/zsh/site-functions (autoload if you wish) for an easy life.
the management of ua for the archive types can be done with libconfig
"section" type stuff. This is the (bash) library which I posted as a
suggested fix to http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342
The section code in that library is very simplistic but will do the
job with minor mods, I plan on extending / improving the functionality
later..
Changing the ua script to bash should be easy and the lu command is
actually just a zsh function wrapped version of the lookup command in
libconfig. lookup had too many characters ;-)
lu is for doing things like:
lu -s : /proc/cpuinfo "model name"
--
Best regards,
Mark mailto:msasgl AT msa-enterprises.com
-
Re[2]: [SM-Discuss] sorcery purists do not read!,
Mark Andrews, 12/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery purists do not read!,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 12/09/2002
-
Re[2]: [SM-Discuss] sorcery purists do not read!,
Mark Andrews, 12/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery purists do not read!,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 12/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery purists do not read!, Dufflebunk, 12/10/2002
- Re[2]: [SM-Discuss] sorcery purists do not read!, Mark Andrews, 12/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery purists do not read!,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 12/10/2002
-
Re[2]: [SM-Discuss] sorcery purists do not read!,
Mark Andrews, 12/10/2002
- Re[3]: [SM-Discuss] sorcery purists do not read!, Mark Andrews, 12/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery purists do not read!,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 12/09/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.