sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: nealbirch <nealbirch AT attbi.com>
- To: Lyon Lemmens <redlemon AT knoware.nl>
- Cc: Ryan Abrams <rabrams AT sourcemage.org>, sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] init fsck weirdness
- Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 15:44:08 -0500
Lyon Lemmens wrote:
I had the same problem.
Turned out there are two links to ../init,d/mount.sh, one called S10mount.sh and the other S10mount
Somebody trying to get smart and rename S10mount.sh to the more common S10mount, but forgetting to remove the old S10mount.sh
So if you rm /etc/rc1.d/S10mount.sh, you'll be fine again.
This should _NOT_ happen in the "almost stable" test grimoire.
oof. 2 bugs in one day. There is a check for this in the lib_runlevel functions, but I didn't get it in the init.d spell. on it.
--
"You can fool some of the people all of the time
--and those are the ones you have to concentrate on!"
GW Bush-- from the N.Y. Times
-
[SM-Discuss] init fsck weirdness,
Ryan Abrams, 11/16/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init fsck weirdness,
Lyon Lemmens, 11/16/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] init fsck weirdness, Ryan Abrams, 11/16/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init fsck weirdness,
nealbirch, 11/16/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init fsck weirdness,
Dufflebunk, 11/16/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] init fsck weirdness, nealbirch, 11/16/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init fsck weirdness,
Dufflebunk, 11/16/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init fsck weirdness,
Lyon Lemmens, 11/16/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.