sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- To: Nick Jennings <nkj AT namodn.com>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] optional_depends descriptions?
- Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 13:02:17 -0500 (EST)
In cast this is done. Inside the ( ... ) is the description. This uses the
last argument (IIRC) of the optional_depends argument. If the brackets are
emty, then the DEPENDS is missing the description, if the brackets are
missing, cast is broken... probably in optional_depends.
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, Nick Jennings wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> One thing that really bugs me is having to answer y/n to an optional
> dependancy of a spell I want, and I really don't know what the particular
> dependancy enables/disables.
>
> Wouldn't it be usefull to have maybe a quick one liner description of
> what this enables/disables for the spell in question?
>
> - Nick
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
--
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
-----------------
PGP public key at
http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x3327A9A5
F1
-
[SM-Discuss] optional_depends descriptions?,
Nick Jennings, 10/27/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] optional_depends descriptions?,
Eric Sandall, 10/27/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] optional_depends descriptions?,
Jason Flatt, 10/27/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] optional_depends descriptions?,
Nick Jennings, 10/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] optional_depends descriptions?, Jonathan Evraire, 10/27/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] optional_depends descriptions?,
Eric Sandall, 10/28/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] optional_depends descriptions?, Ryan Abrams, 10/28/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] optional_depends descriptions?,
Nick Jennings, 10/27/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] optional_depends descriptions?,
Jason Flatt, 10/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] optional_depends descriptions?, Dufflebunk, 10/27/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] optional_depends descriptions?,
Eric Sandall, 10/27/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.