sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Jason Flatt <jasonflatt AT wizard.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] optional_depends descriptions?
- Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 08:16:50 -0700
On Sunday 27 October 2002 01:34 am, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Nick Jennings said:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > One thing that really bugs me is having to answer y/n to an optional
> > dependancy of a spell I want, and I really don't know what the
> > particular dependancy enables/disables.
> >
> > Wouldn't it be usefull to have maybe a quick one liner description of
> > what this enables/disables for the spell in question?
> >
> > - Nick
>
> ? This is already done via optional_depends, as my previously posted
> example shows. Or do you mean something else?
>
> -One of Four
> a.k.a. sandalle
I'm not trying to come down on you, Eric, but I agree with Nick, and your
previous post is a good example:
optional_depends "Linux-PAM" \
"--flag-for-swat" \
"--flag-for-no-swat" \
"for SWAT support"
This is only useful for people who know what SWAT is and why one would want
it. A better one liner might be: "to be able to configure SAMBA via a
Web-based interface"
There are many spells in the grimoire with worse definitions than the one you
proposed:
optional_depends "widget" "" "" "for widget support"
This is almost totally useless. What does widget support get me? Why do I
want it? Is widget support a good thing, or does it just take up hard drive
space? I can't even make an educated guess, based on that information.
I had a spell I cast a couple of weeks ago with several of those sorts of
optional deps in there. I had no idea if I wanted the optional stuff or not.
I didn't know what they were supposed to do to or for the spell I wanted to
install. A little more verbage to clarify those optional deps is, IMO, A
Good Thing(tm).
Again, I'm not trying to attack you. I'm just trying to shed a little light
on the subject.
--
Jason Flatt
Section maintainer for printer
E-mail (remove the spaces): jasonflatt @ wizard . com
E-mail (remove the spaces): jflatt @ sourcemage . org
IRC: Oadae
-
[SM-Discuss] optional_depends descriptions?,
Nick Jennings, 10/27/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] optional_depends descriptions?,
Eric Sandall, 10/27/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] optional_depends descriptions?,
Jason Flatt, 10/27/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] optional_depends descriptions?,
Nick Jennings, 10/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] optional_depends descriptions?, Jonathan Evraire, 10/27/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] optional_depends descriptions?,
Eric Sandall, 10/28/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] optional_depends descriptions?, Ryan Abrams, 10/28/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] optional_depends descriptions?,
Nick Jennings, 10/27/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] optional_depends descriptions?,
Jason Flatt, 10/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] optional_depends descriptions?, Dufflebunk, 10/27/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] optional_depends descriptions?,
Eric Sandall, 10/27/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.