sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Ryan Abrams <rabrams AT sourcemage.org>
- To: sepinkham AT attbi.com
- Cc: " Source Mage - Discuss" <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?
- Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 18:13:15 -0500
Sure it matters, Steve. You are the security officer. This is you getting credit for doing your job so well it was fixed before most people even noticed the problem.
Congratulations. Keep it up. :)
And thanks! :)
-Ryan
On Saturday, October 26, 2002, at 07:07 PM, Eric Sandall wrote:
Sorry Steve, I just remember an 's' in the name, and I was talking to Seth
a lot. :)
-Eric
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?
From: Steven Pinkham <sepinkham AT attbi.com>
Date: Sat, October 26, 2002 15:56
To: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
It was I. Not that it matters...
Steve Pinkham
* Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us> [2002-10-26 18:16]:
Wasn't it you who told me about it on IRC? I thought it was you. If
not, will whomever did tell me, I'll change my story, honest. ;)
-One of Four
--
PGP Key 0x5C8D199A5A317214
Fingerprint=14C0 C194 163E 57CB 0F1B ED87 5C8D 199A 5A31 7214
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux
Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org
http://www.sandall.us/~sandalle | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
<untitled-2>
-
[SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?,
Jonathan Evraire, 10/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?,
Eric Sandall, 10/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?,
Seth Woolley, 10/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?,
Eric Sandall, 10/26/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 10/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?,
Eric Sandall, 10/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?,
Seth Woolley, 10/26/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?,
Eric Sandall, 10/26/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?, Ryan Abrams, 10/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?,
Eric Sandall, 10/26/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.