sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergeyli AT pisem.net>
- To: eric AT sandall.us
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?
- Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 18:43:15 -0400
I'm sure P4 has a history command ;-)...
Eric Sandall wrote:
Wasn't it you who told me about it on IRC? I thought it was you. If not,
will whomever did tell me, I'll change my story, honest. ;)
-One of Four
a.k.a. sandalle
Seth Woolley said:
ehh? I don't remember fixing this one. :)
Seth
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, Eric Sandall wrote:
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:23:24 -0700 (PDT)_______________________________________________
From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?
Jonathan Evraire said:
http://www.ciac.org/ciac/bulletins/n-009.shtmlcompatibility administration daemon (kadmind4) in the MIT krb5
"A stack buffer overflow in the implementation of the Kerberos v4
distribution could be exploited to gain unauthorized root access to
a KDC host."
Does this affect us?Already been fixed in both test and devel, thanks to Seth Wooley. :)
Jonathan Evraire
evraire at tuwg.com
-One of Four
a.k.a. sandalle
--
PGP Key 0x5C8D199A5A317214
Fingerprint=14C0 C194 163E 57CB 0F1B ED87 5C8D 199A 5A31 7214
Eric Sandall | Source Mage
GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us |
http://www.sourcemage.org http://www.sandall.us/~sandalle | SysAdmin
@ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU http://counter.li.org #196285 |
http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
_______________________________________________
SM-Discuss mailing list
SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
SM-Discuss mailing list
SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
------------------
Get free mailbox 20 Mb at http://www.hotbox.ru
-
[SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?,
Jonathan Evraire, 10/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?,
Eric Sandall, 10/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?,
Seth Woolley, 10/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?,
Eric Sandall, 10/26/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 10/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?,
Eric Sandall, 10/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?,
Seth Woolley, 10/26/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?,
Eric Sandall, 10/26/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?, Ryan Abrams, 10/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?,
Eric Sandall, 10/26/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.