sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Eric Sandall" <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?
- Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:23:24 -0700 (PDT)
Jonathan Evraire said:
> http://www.ciac.org/ciac/bulletins/n-009.shtml
>
> "A stack buffer overflow in the implementation of the Kerberos v4
> compatibility administration daemon (kadmind4) in the MIT krb5
> distribution could be exploited to gain unauthorized root access to a
> KDC host."
>
> Does this affect us?
>
> Jonathan Evraire
> evraire at tuwg.com
Already been fixed in both test and devel, thanks to Seth Wooley. :)
-One of Four
a.k.a. sandalle
--
PGP Key 0x5C8D199A5A317214
Fingerprint=14C0 C194 163E 57CB 0F1B ED87 5C8D 199A 5A31 7214
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux
Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org
http://www.sandall.us/~sandalle | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-
[SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?,
Jonathan Evraire, 10/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?,
Eric Sandall, 10/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?,
Seth Woolley, 10/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?,
Eric Sandall, 10/26/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 10/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?,
Eric Sandall, 10/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?,
Seth Woolley, 10/26/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?,
Eric Sandall, 10/26/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?, Ryan Abrams, 10/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?,
Eric Sandall, 10/26/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.