sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Spencer Ogden <spencero AT mail.utexas.edu>
- To: SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery recover ?
- Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 22:52:44 -0500
I kind of like this idea. The only problem is that one of the errors that
can occur is the whole of sorcery getting nuked. It would be nice is
apprentice stayed intact in this case, a little better to type `apprentice
recover` rather than `/tmp/sorcery.restore`, feels more polished.
Spencer
On Monday 07 October 2002 09:31 pm, Nick Jennings wrote:
> How about we bring back 'apprentice' as a command... which will aid
> in spell writers & SA's ? Contains those misc scripts etc.
>
> Though I think 'rebuild_packages' is an excemption to apprentice, and
> should be in sorcery most likely... Or maybe cast? Not sure.
>
> But I do like the idea of taking the useful scripts from the utilities
> section and including them in the sorcery suite in some fashion.
>
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 09:52:58PM -0400, Dufflebunk wrote:
> > It would be a good idea to take all of the misc util scripts floating
> > around and nicefy them, document, and package them together and make a
> > sorcery-utils spell.
> >
> >
> >
> > <removed cross posting>
> >
> > On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 22:04, Nick Jennings wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > On my dev machine, I wiped out my packages file somewhere along the
> > > line... no biggie, I used the 'rebuild_packages' script in the
> > > utilities module of the sourcemage repository...
> > >
> > > Was wondering if people think it would be a good idea to have that
> > > feature as a sorcery command? Perhaps 'sorcery recover' or
> > > something?
> > >
> > > Let me know what you think, and if you have a different suggestion
> > > for the name of the sorcery parameter.
> > >
> > > - Nick
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > SM-Discuss mailing list
> > > SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
> > -----------------
> > PGP public key at
> > http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x3327A9A5
> > F1
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
-
[SM-Discuss] sorcery recover ?,
Nick Jennings, 10/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery recover ?,
Dufflebunk, 10/07/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery recover ?, Seth Woolley, 10/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery recover ?,
Nick Jennings, 10/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery recover ?,
Spencer Ogden, 10/07/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery recover ?, Andrew, 10/08/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery recover ?,
Spencer Ogden, 10/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery recover ?,
Dufflebunk, 10/07/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.