sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Andrew Stitt <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery
- Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 08:03:49 -0700
On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 09:29:58AM -0500, Ryan Abrams wrote:
> The real reason is that devel-sorcery isn't "officially" released - it's
> devel. If you are playing with unstable spells, you should use a stable tool
> to do it, so you can save yourself if you need to.
that makes sense now, although my sorcery has been anything but stable
for the past few days :(
>
> That said, there is an effort to fully split sorcery and the grimoire. In
> fact, the infrastructure is done. It's just a matter of the sorcery team
> getting a release out that lets people choose their sorcery version and
> grimoire version seperately.
>
that was going to be my next question, if there will be a way to choose
a sorcery as well, and if the changes in sorcery will be reflected on
the rest of a sorcery update, ie devel-sorcery on compiler flags and
such.
-
[SM-Discuss] sorcery,
Andrew Stitt, 08/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery,
Ryan Abrams, 08/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery,
Andrew Stitt, 08/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery,
Ryan Abrams, 08/07/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery, Andrew Stitt, 08/07/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery, jack, 08/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery,
Ryan Abrams, 08/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery,
Jonathan Evraire, 08/07/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery, Ryan Abrams, 08/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery,
Andrew Stitt, 08/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery,
Ryan Abrams, 08/07/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.