sm-commit AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Source Mage code commit list
List archive
Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 79419 by Daniel Goller for review
- From: Daniel Goller <dgoller AT satx.rr.com>
- To: SM-Commit Daemon <sm-commit AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 79419 by Daniel Goller for review
- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 19:55:00 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>
> And did you check with ruskie before removing a package from his
> grimoire and Arwed if it is okay to move into his? ;)
>
> -sandalle
I did the move on ruskie's suggestion, since he is eager to get rid of
it, it also fits much better in science than anything else, i do owe
Arwed the question if he wanted it there. (sorry, i missed that, no excuses)
so should i revert this in games?
this leaves me wondering if i can get an OK from everyone to add new
spells as long as i take care of them, and not simply dump work on them,
although i do want to be courteous, i would like to be able to add
spells i don't neglect on a truly free agent basis. (if not i have to
just get better at emailing the respective section maintainers ahead of
time, whatever works best for everyone)
take care of them meaning add myself to the section MAINTAINER file, in
the fashion as it is done in mail/MAINTAINER, and be responsible for
their maintenance, as to not just drop stuff into a section and then let
others have to pick up the pieces, nono :)
that would be for new spells, i would ask in any case where i would like
to maintain a spell that already exists.
i do apologize for the bumpy move, when ruskie told me to integ, delete,
submit he must have implied a waiting period i did not pick up on.
should be the only thing i will move in a long time.
Daniel
>
> --
> Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
> eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
> http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Shock Physics @ WSU
> http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
_______________________________________________
SM-Commit mailing list
SM-Commit AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-commit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEa8Xk+HaycIPdpbkRAixPAJsGiK8zM2F1fWSii/zAHvXgLcTcGQCdFLn6
+2iFRie26onOQg9g6yGYGl0=
=k//r
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 79419 by Daniel Goller for review,
Perforce Review Daemon, 05/16/2006
-
Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 79419 by Daniel Goller for review,
Arwed von Merkatz, 05/17/2006
-
Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 79419 by Daniel Goller for review,
Eric Sandall, 05/17/2006
- Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 79419 by Daniel Goller for review, Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 05/17/2006
-
Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 79419 by Daniel Goller for review,
Daniel Goller, 05/17/2006
-
Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 79419 by Daniel Goller for review,
Jeremy Blosser, 05/17/2006
-
Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 79419 by Daniel Goller for review,
Daniel Goller, 05/17/2006
- Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 79419 by Daniel Goller for review, Jeremy Blosser, 05/17/2006
- Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 79419 by Daniel Goller for review, Eric Sandall, 05/17/2006
-
Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 79419 by Daniel Goller for review,
Daniel Goller, 05/17/2006
-
Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 79419 by Daniel Goller for review,
seth, 05/17/2006
- Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 79419 by Daniel Goller for review, Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 05/18/2006
-
Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 79419 by Daniel Goller for review,
Jeremy Blosser, 05/17/2006
-
Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 79419 by Daniel Goller for review,
Eric Sandall, 05/17/2006
-
Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 79419 by Daniel Goller for review,
Arwed von Merkatz, 05/17/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.