sm-commit AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Source Mage code commit list
List archive
Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 78788 by Matthew Clark for review
- From: Matthew Clark <MatthewClark AT InLesserTerms.net>
- To: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>, SM-Commit Daemon <sm-commit AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 78788 by Matthew Clark for review
- Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 11:19:09 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Yeah, didn't realize SM-Commit was in my CC line -- never paid attention
to it.
Now I know :).
- - Matt
Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote:
> On May 02, Eric Sandall [eric AT sandall.us] wrote:
>> Matthew Clark wrote:
>>> Arwed corrected me, and so I corrected it. Or so I thought. Hmm...
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>> <snip>
>>
>> Did you remember to use the -t flag on integrate?
>>
>> -sandalle
>>
>> PS: Why do you remove the sm-commit list on replies?
>
> He's probably using 'reply' instead of 'group reply'.
>
> <plug>
> It would be nice if everyone's mailer supported the 'mail-followup-to'
> header, both for mails they originate and mails they reply to. It's "nice
> to have" on normal mailing lists, but for one like the commits list I have
> no real idea from this thread so far if he's on the list or not. If he is,
> he'll get this mail at least twice.
>
> http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/98dec/I-D/draft-ietf-drums-mail-followup-to-00.txt
> </plug>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> !DSPAM:1,4457838c318731723568848!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEV4Z97vwGAOVJvJ8RAnTPAKDTwsvgxHenH1Zgfqrj9WcJsUsVYACgpn07
gvV9lj2FtcCs1+jtCsUxOlc=
=3O0X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 78788 by Matthew Clark for review,
Perforce Review Daemon, 05/01/2006
-
Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 78788 by Matthew Clark for review,
Eric Sandall, 05/02/2006
-
Message not available
-
Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 78788 by Matthew Clark for review,
Eric Sandall, 05/02/2006
- Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 78788 by Matthew Clark for review, Matthew Clark, 05/02/2006
-
Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 78788 by Matthew Clark for review,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 05/02/2006
- Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 78788 by Matthew Clark for review, Matthew Clark, 05/02/2006
-
Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 78788 by Matthew Clark for review,
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 05/02/2006
-
Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 78788 by Matthew Clark for review,
Arwed von Merkatz, 05/02/2006
- Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 78788 by Matthew Clark for review, Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 05/02/2006
- Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 78788 by Matthew Clark for review, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 05/02/2006
-
Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 78788 by Matthew Clark for review,
Arwed von Merkatz, 05/02/2006
- Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 78788 by Matthew Clark for review, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 05/02/2006
-
Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 78788 by Matthew Clark for review,
Eric Sandall, 05/02/2006
-
Message not available
-
Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 78788 by Matthew Clark for review,
Eric Sandall, 05/02/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.