Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-commit - Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 78788 by Matthew Clark for review

sm-commit AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Source Mage code commit list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
  • To: sm-commit AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 78788 by Matthew Clark for review
  • Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 18:30:16 +0200

On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 06:20:49PM +0200, Andraž ruskie Levstik wrote:
> Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote :
>
> > gpg: Signature made tor 02 maj 2006 18:02:48 CEST using DSA key ID
> > F009764F
> > gpg: Good signature from "Jeremy Blosser <jblosser AT firinn.org>"
> > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> > gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> > owner.
>
> > Primary key fingerprint: 867D C269 21C2 7643 E9E3 6478 285D BEC5 F009
> > 764F
> >
> >
> > On May 02, Eric Sandall [eric AT sandall.us] wrote:
> > > Matthew Clark wrote:
> > > > Arwed corrected me, and so I corrected it. Or so I thought. Hmm...
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > > Did you remember to use the -t flag on integrate?
> > >
> > > -sandalle
> > >
> > > PS: Why do you remove the sm-commit list on replies?
> >
> > He's probably using 'reply' instead of 'group reply'.
> >
> > <plug>
> > It would be nice if everyone's mailer supported the 'mail-followup-to'
> > header, both for mails they originate and mails they reply to. It's "nice
> > to have" on normal mailing lists, but for one like the commits list I have
> > no real idea from this thread so far if he's on the list or not. If he
> > is,
> > he'll get this mail at least twice.
> >
> > http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/98dec/I-D/draft-ietf-drums-mail-followup-to-00.txt
> >
> > </plug>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Commit mailing list
> > SM-Commit AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-commit
> >
> >
>
> No what WOULD be nice is the mailer soft NOT setting a Reply-To:
> header as that's annoying for replys...

Having the Reply-To: header set is the sanest we can do imho. That way
you can easily reply to either the commiter (simple reply), the list
(list reply) or both (group reply). Any sane mailer has a list-reply
feature, so that works out fine.

--
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
http://www.sourcemage.org




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page