Developer Only Discussion List

[Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Sunday 18:00 GMT 
(I will be there, even though it is 5 am Monday for me)
I would also like to see more regular meetings, weekly (or even fortnightly) 
one hour meetings instead of the monolithic 2-3 hour meeting once a month 
(which we haven't really had for 2-3 months anyway). More regular meetings 
give us more warning if a team is falling behind, (hopefully) means more 
people would be able to attend at least one meeting per month, gives active 
devels a chance to discuss current issues without worrying about extending an 
already long meeting into a marathon and would boost team spirit and morale 
by letting everyone see each others progress on a more regular basis.
I think the time should be adjusted/discussed also, it is obviously not a 
good 
time, so few people turn up at the moment and I refuse to believe they are 
all just lazy mofo's

Hamish

On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:43, Andrew wrote:
> Is the meeting on Saturday or Sunday? I can't remember, and I have a
> feeling im not the only one.
>
> -Andrew
>
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 06:35:46PM -0800, Eric Sandall wrote:
> > I would like to propose a meeting of all the Team Leads this weekend (and
> > anyone else who'd like to show up) in #smgl-admin, at the usual time
> > (18:00 GMT, I believe), if that time does not work, let me know so we can
> > work it out. Team Leads are /strongly/ encouraged to show as I would like
> > to talk about team activies, roadmaps, deadlines, and anything else the
> > leads would like to discuss. We haven't had a developer meeting in a
> > while and I feel that at least the TLs should have a talk.
> >
> > Actually, TLs (yes, this includes me ;)) should communicate more about
> > what they are doing (that's what sm-admin is for, yes?) so that we can
> > coordinate changes among our respective teams (such as updates to stable
> > grimoire for the ISO, Sorcery changes that affect spells and vice versa,
> > etc.).
> >
> > I will be expecting all TLs to be there, but if you cannot make it, let
> > me know, a reason would be a good idea, that way I can work to make the
> > time more accessible to you or get your input before the meeting. If any
> > TL is not there, I will be a little upset (barring a good reason).
> >
> > Comments?
> >
> > -sandalle
> >
> > --
> > PGP Key Fingerprint:  FCFF 26A1 BE21 08F4 BB91  FAED 1D7B 7D74 A8EF DD61
> > http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8EFDD61
> >
> > -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> > Version: 3.12
> > GCS/E/IT$ d-- s++:+>: a-- C++(+++) BL++++VIS>$ P+(++) L+++ E-(---) W++
> > N+@ o? K? w++++>-- O M-@ V-- PS+(+++) PE(-) Y++(+) PGP++(+) t+() 5++ X(+)
> > R+(++) tv(--)b++(+++) DI+@ D++(+++) G>+++ e>+++ h---(++) r++ y+
> > ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
> >
> > Eric Sandall                     |  Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
> > eric AT sandall.us                  |  http://www.sourcemage.org/
> > http://eric.sandall.us/          |  SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
> > http://counter.li.org/  #196285  |  http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Admin mailing list
> > SM-Admin AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-admin

- -- 
IRC nick: drmoriarty
SMGL co-conspirator
# Do You SMGL!?
# http://www.sourcemage.org/
# Linux so advanced it may as well be magic!
ANTI-SPAM WARNING: I delete any html message from my server without reading
Please use text only
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAFzI68fSufZR6424RAt+iAJ4jd1xBl9Gs5m3OuZqqP3MKxwyGDACeKaWQ
eBxHvwSFIMydTWSJ8k6MPAM=
=4C98
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----