Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

permaculture - [permaculture] Dear capitalists, admit you got it wrong From The Economist

permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: permaculture

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Nicholas Roberts <nicholas@themediasociety.org>
  • To: Tom Toogood <ecoed@dodo.com.au>, permaculture <permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org>, Robyn Francis <robyn@permaculture.com.au>, Ethan Jucovy <ethan.jucovy@gmail.com>, Jack Heimsoth <djspiritsoul@gmail.com>, Peter Wood <drwoood@gmail.com>
  • Subject: [permaculture] Dear capitalists, admit you got it wrong From The Economist
  • Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 19:00:24 +1100

The World Social Forum

http://www.economist.com/world/international/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13061828&source=cmailer
Dear capitalists, admit you got it wrong

Feb 5th 2009 | BELÉM
>From *The Economist* print edition
Buoyed up by a crisis and with five presidents in attendance, the
international left has ideas for fixing the world that a neoliberal might
recognise
AP

OFTEN mocked for an endless ability to disagree with itself, the World
Social Forum—an annual jamboree for NGOs, anti-capitalists, leftish
intellectuals, bohemians and bishops—was unusually united this year. More
united, in some ways, than the recent World Economic Forum in the Swiss
resort of Davos, a gathering of political and corporate bigwigs to which the
social forum supposedly responds.

While Davos Man was busy looking for someone to blame for his predicament,
no such doubts troubled his opposite number in Belém, a city on the edge of
the Brazilian rainforest where mango trees grow so tall that their fruits
can shatter car windscreens when they fall. The culprit was the whole
current design of the world economy, promoting competition. Free trade and
free movement of capital needed to be re-thought, participants insisted.
Some even had ideas on what should replace it.
[image: Click Here]
<http://ad.doubleclick.net/click%3Bh=v8/37cc/3/0/%2a/c%3B210248007%3B0-0%3B2%3B31658731%3B799-350/300%3B29546213/29564092/1%3B%3B%7Eaopt%3D2/1/e/0%3B%7Esscs%3D%3fhttp://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/9203-67091-2114-1?mpt=4360380>
<http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/web.economist.com/all_articles;nav=world_politics_v_international;audience_topic=economicissues;audience_channel=commerce;pos=mpu_left;tile=4;sz=350x300,336x236,300x250,250x250;ord=427607994?>

The forum's main purpose is to bring together social movements (which
generally dislike being called NGOs) from around the world to network. In
that respect, it is rather like any other business conference, though some
participants carry spears and wear the feathers of various unfortunate
parrots on their heads. The forum is skewed towards Latin America,
especially Brazil. One of the founders of the forum is a Brazilian
businessman called Oded Grajew, and its first meeting was held in Porto
Alegre, in southern Brazil.

Of more than 5,000 accredited organisations, 4,193 were from South America,
roughly ten times the number of African outfits present. This partly
reflects the number and prominence of NGOs in South America and the
semi-official role which some governments give them. This year Brazil's
left-leaning government gave the forum a subsidy of R$120m ($52m)—a piece of
generosity that was not universally popular at a time when economic growth
may be on the verge of halting.

As a result, many causes dear to the Brazilian left were well represented.
T-shirts demanded asylum for Cesare Battisti, a left-wing Italian émigré
convicted of murder in Rome, who is currently in Brazil. Banners called for
Brazilian troops to be withdrawn from Haiti, where they are doing a good job
of containing violence.

A proposed hydroelectric dam on the Madeira river (a tributary of the
Amazon) was denounced, and the country's new oil find claimed for its
people. Plenty of people came from further afield, like the Catholic
Bishops' Conference of India, with a Delphic slogan: "We would rather sweat
in peace than bleed in war." And there were swarms of young, largely white
folk who treated the forum like a music festival.

This cacophony sometimes sat awkwardly with the presence of five leftish
presidents—Fernando Lugo of Paraguay, Rafael Correa of Ecuador, Evo Morales
of Bolivia, Hugo Chávez of Venezuela and Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva of
Brazil—who dropped in to be fêted. The flurry of helicopters and security
men seemed out of place. Four leaders (President Lula was elsewhere)
appeared together at a meeting that was billed as a dialogue with the social
movements. But the talking was mostly one way. Mr Chávez gave a long,
rambling speech in which he struggled to animate the crowd. "Another world
is possible! No! Another world is necessary," was as inspiring as it got.

Since its inception, the forum has struggled to get the right balance
between a range of attractions: intellectual stars such as Noam Chomsky and
Joseph Stiglitz, both of whom have addressed previous meetings; sympathetic
politicians; large NGOs and the smaller single-issue organisations which
often feel squeezed out.

This tension produced the best exchange in the presidential meeting. "You
all talk about doing these things," said João Pedro Stedile, a founder of
the Landless Movement in Brazil, "but when you met in Bahia [in December]
you just went to the beach." "I didn't go to the beach," muttered the
Venezuelan leader. "Well, perhaps those of you who are a bit overweight
didn't go," Mr Stedile fired back.

Away from this set-piece spat, people were sitting in meeting rooms and
coming up with proposals. The ones that dealt with reforming finance read a
bit like a co-production between militant anti-capitalists and more cautious
types, which was no accident. At the far edge was the idea that money and
finance are public goods and should be shared out accordingly, through
democracy. The familiar call for a special tax on international transactions
was repeated. But there was plenty of talk that was more moderate and rather
more interesting.

The forum suggested that the United Nations should be charged with
preventing large trade surpluses and deficits from building up. Controls on
exchange rates and the international movement of capital should be
re-established. Credit-rating agencies should be reformed, incentives for
excessive risk-taking reduced and bankers' bonuses paid on the basis of
long-term performance. Hedge funds, private-equity firms and other parts of
the shadow banking system should go, along with over-the-counter derivatives
(OTCs), collateralised-debt obligations (CDOs) and other nefarious
structured products.

In general, a "speculator pays" principle should be introduced and applied
when things go wrong. Finally, the world's economy should get a stimulus in
the form of a green New Deal.

Bits of this belong to the realm of reality; indeed, they might have come
from America's Democratic Party, or even from the op-ed pages of a
respectable business daily. Interestingly, the forum proposed an outright
ban on subprime mortgages, even though it might have been expected to look
favourably on lending to people who would otherwise struggle to get credit.

If some delegates seemed to have thought hard about the economic crisis, the
same could not be said of the visiting presidents. After leading the crowd
in a chant of "Fidel, Fidel, Fidel!" Mr Chávez joined Messrs Lugo, Morales
and Correa in a karaoke rendition of "*Hasta **siempre commandante*"—a dirge
about the exploits of Che Guevara—before disappearing. That was far too
cruel a fate for the assembled company of Asian bishops, indigenous types in
all their finery, would-be financial reformers and anti-capitalist warriors.

--
Nicholas Roberts
[im] skype:niccolor



  • [permaculture] Dear capitalists, admit you got it wrong From The Economist, Nicholas Roberts, 02/06/2009

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page