permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: permaculture
List archive
- From: Chad Knepp <pyg@galatea.org>
- To: permaculture <permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: [permaculture] list mirroring and copyright
- Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 09:40:55 -0600
Hi,
I had the exact same idea about 3 years ago, seeing the same
questions/debates over and over and wondering how to turn this
incredible source of information into a more accessible resource and
perhaps cut down on some repetition. Currently a small group of
permie-geeks are working on something like this starting by extending
a CC licenced derivative of the PFAF dataset. The latest most
interesting version (as in fully editable) is
<http://dev.permaculture.info/>. If this is interesting to you
please consider joining us instead of heading out on your own.
Cheers,
Chad
neshura writes:
> At one point I started writing the skeleton of a pc-wiki that would
> spider, analyze, and structure the whole of the PC list archive so
> that I could browse the emails in a rich-context format, i.e. with
> plant names linked back to a best-guess PFAF link, similar emails
> grouped together and taggable, annotation and deep-linking of common
> terms, author-grouping, and url-scraping into a "bookmarks" page for
> myself.
>
> But I got distracted, probably by something shiny. Anyway, since the
> archive is freely available for viewing and copying right now, it
> seems to me wise to look into the standing of the archive per
> copyright. I would assume that the default is that the copyright on
> each email belongs to the author unless and until they explicitly give
> up or transfer their rights? I have no idea, actually. There is no
> license information limiting reproduction of the archives when one
> signs up, nor are there any limits published on the archive site
> itself.
>
> Since there *is* useful information in the list from which people
> might profit, like much of the Internet except probably the wholly
> useless blogosphere, perhaps a permie-friendly Creative Commons
> license on content is in order.
>
> I would release whatever worthless rambling I write into the public
> domain and good luck to the scammers, but there are certainly more
> knowledgeable and experienced permaculturists as well as authors who
> might have more concern.
>
> Any thoughts?
> -neshura
--
Chad Knepp
python -c 'import base64;print base64.decodestring("cHlnQGdhbGF0ZWEub3Jn")'
- [permaculture] list mirroring and copyright, Chad Knepp, 12/02/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.