Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

permaculture - [permaculture] Pond/Dams - Muddy, turbid, scummy

permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: permaculture

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Gaden@ziplip.com" <Gaden@ziplip.com>
  • To: permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [permaculture] Pond/Dams - Muddy, turbid, scummy
  • Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 05:41:48 -0700 (PDT)


I see a lot of people creating ponds & dams designed like icecream scoops out
of the ground. That is, steep sharp sides.

As with so many ecosystems, the edges are where much of the action is
happening. (Respect The Edges, Long Life The Edge (of Chaos)). Healthy
pondage needs at least one, if not several, ledges. These allow growth of
plants (and associated fauna) around the edge. This plant growth filters,
removes (well, transforms) some of the excess nutrients, protects juvenile
insects/fishes etc. and many other functions. On a smaller scale, potted
waterplants can be placed in the water.

Ponds tend to act as nutrient sinks/sumps. This nutrient content has to be
transformed and transferred. A balanced system will recycle this
indefinately. But in many systems, input exceeds capacity. Nurification
occurs and the system flips into anerobic mode becoming smelly, stagnant, and
deoxygenated. Thus other means such as harvesting plants/animals from the
system helps rebalance the system.

For example: The duck/azolla/carp/tilapa/silkworms/mulberry pondage systems
seen in asia. Much of the nutrient flow from the households/pigs etc ends up
in the pond. It cycles through the system and is eventually removed. Ducks &
fish get eaten. Azolla ends up a nitrogen rich mulch. And each year or so,
the pond may be drained and the bottom sludge spread on surrounding fields.
Clever idea...

Gaiden





  • [permaculture] Pond/Dams - Muddy, turbid, scummy, Gaden@ziplip.com, 06/13/2003

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page