Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

nafex - [NAFEX] if the buds break dormancy in the same year they are implanted

nafex@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: North American Fruit Explorers mailing list at ibiblio

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: William McNam <billmcnam@yahoo.com>
  • To: "nafex@lists.ibiblio.org" <nafex@lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: [NAFEX] if the buds break dormancy in the same year they are implanted
  • Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 13:11:56 -0700 (PDT)

 
Did the shoots wch grew out of the implanted buds survive the winter?
 
Often if the buds break dormancy in the same year they are implanted, the
shoot growth they produce does not survive their first winter. The shoots
grow too late into the fall, do not achieve sufficient caliper, nor go
sufficienttly dormant to survive the winter.
Your timing was good.
If buds are cut too early from current year's growth, they may not be mature.
One can get around this by placing a containerized plant of the bud donar
tree into a heated greenhouse --thereby inducing it to break dormancy and
begin shoot growth several weeks earlier than it would otherwise do so
outside.
This method can save one an entire year!
 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
 
From: "Scott Smith" <scott@cs.jhu.edu>
To: "North American Fruit Explorers" <nafex@lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 6:12 PM
Subject: Re: [NAFEX] Summer grafting of persimmons


>I tried one last year, did a chip bud in June from a this-years shoot I saw
>a dormant bud on by the base of a leaf already.  I forced it in two weeks
>by cutting most of the top of the stock and bending over; the graft
>proceeded to put on about 3' of new growth last year.  I didn't remove the
>bent-over shoot until the plant was dormant, it wasn't growing much after I
>bent it over.  Overall I was pretty impressed, it did a lot better than I
>had expected.
>
> Scott
>

>From colleendaly@videotron.ca Wed May 11 18:33:18 2011
Return-Path: <colleendaly@videotron.ca>
X-Original-To: nafex@lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: nafex@lists.ibiblio.org
Received: by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix, from userid 20217)
id 932E8E98D3; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:33:18 -0400 (EDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on
mailman1.ibiblio.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 testsºYES_20,HTML_MESSAGE
autolearn=ham version=3.2.5
X-Greylist: delayed 3597 seconds by postgrey-1.33 at mailman1.ibiblio.org;
Wed, 11 May 2011 18:33:17 EDT
Received: from relais.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca [24.201.245.36])
by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08CB7E98D0
for <nafex@lists.ibiblio.org>; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:33:17 -0400 (EDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Received: from vl-mo-mpf02.ip.videotron.ca ([10.23.37.51])
by VL-MR-MRZ20.ip.videotron.ca
(Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008;
32bit))
with ESMTP id <0LL1006CNVUYFX90@VL-MR-MRZ20.ip.videotron.ca> for
nafex@lists.ibiblio.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:32:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from videotron.ca (unknown [10.23.32.117])
by vl-mo-mpf02.ip.videotron.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 986D572879D
for
<nafex@lists.ibiblio.org>; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:33:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [10.23.37.11] (Forwarded-For: 96.21.140.126)
by vl-vm-mm006.ip.videotron.ca (mshttpd);
Wed, 11 May 2011 17:33:19 -0400
From: colleendaly@videotron.ca
To: North American Fruit Explorers <nafex@lists.ibiblio.org>
Message-id: <7570dc3a417b.4dcac85f@videotron.ca>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 17:33:19 -0400
X-Mailer: Oracle Communications Messenger Express 7u4-18.01 64bit (built Jul
15
2010)
Content-language: en
X-Accept-Language: en
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <82154.96403.qm@web46208.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
References: <82154.96403.qm@web46208.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.9
Subject: [NAFEX] Bark Grafting on non-dormant apple trees
X-BeenThere: nafex@lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: North American Fruit Explorers <nafex@lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Id: North American Fruit Explorers <nafex.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/nafex>,
<mailto:nafex-request@lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/nafex>
List-Post: <mailto:nafex@lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa@lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/nafex>,
<mailto:nafex-request@lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 22:33:18 -0000




Hi,


is it possible to do (successful) bark grafting with dormant
scions on trees (apple) that have
broken dormancy, say, soon after petal fall ?


Sincerely,
Peter Drevniok, Gatineau, QC
, zone 5



> nafex mailing list
> nafex@lists.ibiblio.org
> Subscribe, unsubscribe, change your user configuration or find
> out more about the list here:
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/nafex
> NAFEX web site: http://www.nafex.org/



  • [NAFEX] if the buds break dormancy in the same year they are implanted, William McNam, 05/11/2011

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page