nafex@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: North American Fruit Explorers mailing list at ibiblio
List archive
- From: David Oliver <david.thefields@gmail.com>
- To: nafex@lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [NAFEX] soil testing equipment
- Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 07:55:25 -0400
Dennis,
Thanks for your reply. In this project, the trees are permanently in 25 gal containers. As a means of dealing with fluctuating winter temperatures of Mid-Atlantic states that most stone fruit cannot tolerate, the trees are moved from outside into temperature controlled dormant storage sometime in December. They are moved into greenhouse at bloom. Following last frost, the trees are moved back outside completing the cycle.
The process is challenging. But there have been successes with sweet cherry, pluots, and apricots using this method. Peaches (surprisingly) and nectarines have posed more problems. (My apple orchard is conventional and outside.) Tree structure (pruning), proper nutrition, and moisture control are critical to control root disease. Disease in the greenhouse (aphids and spider mites) has not been a serious problem and is controlled with insecticidal soaps.
I do have a media pile composed of pH adjusted 75% pine bark, 25% sand. Soil can be properly prepared on initiating a tree. However, maintaining nutrition as the seasons pass requires both visual observation of the tree and some measure of the nutrient situation at each point int time. At several tens of dollars per test, lab testing is not economically feasible except perhaps in certain critical cases. On site testing with a "kit" is more appropriate. The problem with kits, e.g.
http://scientificsonline.com/product.asp_Q_pn_E_3081593
is small sample size. However, by taking a significant set of samples from the container, carefully homogenizing them in a blender thoroughly and then taking the final sample for the reagents from this homogeneous blend, I believe on-site kits can be useful for the basics of pH, K, P, and N. (though I have yet to prove this). That's all I can tell you at this point. I was hoping those on this list would know far more about testing than I do. Most apparently do not. You do for a procedure required for your operation and I thank you for it. What you are doing seems quite appropriate. My situation is somewhat different.
David Oliver
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 16:05:15 -0500
From: <dmnorton@royaloakfarmorchard.com>
Subject: Re: [NAFEX] soil testing equipment
David,
We have always used A & L Great Lakes Labs for our soil tests. We take the
samples ourselves and get results in a few days via their web site documents
service with any recommendations for amendments. We also do leaf testing at
the same time and those results we submit to Wilbur-Ellis for foliar spray
recommendations if out trees show uptake issues. We have 120 acres to test,
so this works best for us. Do you keep your dwarf trees in the containers
100% of the time? Do you have a location where you could build a topsoil
holding block (a pile of top soil)? When we were using our greenhouse
regularly, we used a topsoil pile that we had tested once each spring and
amended the pile according to the soils test. We had it enclosed on three
sides to keep it from getting contaminated just like a composting pile. In
fact, we always added some compost to it throughout the year and tested it
prior to use. One pile, one test, than many 10 gallon containers with the
same soil mix. Just a thought!
Dennis Norton
Royal Oak Farm Orchard
Office (815) 648-4467
Mobile (815) 228-2174
Fax (609) 228-2174
http://www.royaloakfarmorchard.com
http://www.theorchardkeeper.blogspot.com
http://www.revivalhymn.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Oliver" <david.thefields@gmail.com>
To: <nafex@lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 1:41 PM
Subject: [NAFEX] soil testing equipment
I'd be grateful to list members who routinely test their soil to describe
the tests they make and whether they analyze samples themselves or send
samples to a testing lab. Basics are pH, P, K, Ca, Mg, and then Fe, Zn,
Mn, soluble salts, nitrates, I'm growing dwarf trees in large
containers so routine testing is required as there is little latitude for
error in a container. This suggests having a small lab for one's own
testing might be the most cost effective. Any suggestions for equipment,
suppliers, and costs including the outside lab option would be
appreciated.
Thanks,
David Oliver
-
[NAFEX] soil testing equipment,
David Oliver, 05/06/2009
- Re: [NAFEX] soil testing equipment, dmnorton, 05/07/2009
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [NAFEX] soil testing equipment, David Oliver, 05/08/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.