Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

nafex - Re: [NAFEX] Blueberries in Paradise: Farmer tweaks soil

nafex@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: North American Fruit Explorers mailing list at ibiblio

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Stephen Sadler" <Docshiva@Docshiva.org>
  • To: "'North American Fruit Explorers'" <nafex@lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [NAFEX] Blueberries in Paradise: Farmer tweaks soil
  • Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 21:26:35 -0700

I hope continued DNA analyses will reduce the taxonomic nightmare... yes,
the coffee has C, roasted or not (less after roasting); but more importantly
the essential element Cf...

~ Stephen

-----Original Message-----
From: nafex-bounces@lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:nafex-bounces@lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Robert C. Mullins
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 9:10 PM
To: nafex@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [NAFEX] Blueberries in Paradise: Farmer tweaks soil

Stephen,

I am with you on this point about specificity. Particularly with regard
to plants and plant species. I would wish that the Latin nomenclature
would somehow be used more often, even though I understand the taxonomic
nightmare to some degree.


I believe I must point out that coffee beans after being roasted should
contain some carbon wouldn't they? ;)

Just thought I would share.

Robert C. Mullins M.S. IT
GaelicMysts Farms and Permaculture, Owner
Clarksville, Ar
Zone 8a
http://wildcraft.gaelicmysts.com


> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 11:05:48 -0700
> From: "Stephen Sadler" <Docshiva@Docshiva.org>
> Subject: Re: [NAFEX] Blueberries in Paradise: Farmer tweaks soil to
> successfully
> To: "'North American Fruit Explorers'" <nafex@lists.ibiblio.org>
> Message-ID: <009501c8f725$e3c3f4e0$ab4bdea0$@org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> That was pretty cool, and I'm happy for the farmer and for blueberry
lovers
> in Utah.
>
>
>
> As a biochemist, though, I've been getting a bit annoyed at some reporting
> I've seen lately. Here, "removing the calcium and magnesium - referred to
> as carbonates." Wouldn't it seem sensible to someone who's taken high
> school chemistry that carbonates should contain, I don't know, some
carbon?
> And that calcium and magnesium per se would not, and exist in forms other
> than calcite and magnesite? I understand in this specific case he was
> removing Calcium and Magnesium carbonates, but the inference that,
> therefore, Ca and Mg are "referred to as carbonates" I'm sure was
> universally accepted as blindly as it was assumed and reported. I think
the
> public hears sciencey or mathy talk and goes, "oh, I don't understand
those
> things, but I learned something now - carbonate means calcium or
magnesium.
> So, let's see, milk is a good source of healthy carbonates;" or the brain
> just shuts off altogether when it hears about somethingates.
>
>
>
> Yes. I see I'm testy. Will stop complaining now and drink my coffee. I
> take it black, no creamer, so no carbonates for me this morning..--
>
>
_______________________________________________
nafex mailing list
nafex@lists.ibiblio.org

Reproduction of list messages or archives is not allowed.
This includes distribution on other email lists or reproduction on web
sites.
Permission to reproduce is NEVER granted, so don't claim you have
permission!

**YOU MUST BE SUBSCRIBED TO POST!**
Posts from email addresses that are not subscribed are discarded.
No exceptions.
----
To subscribe or unsubscribe, go to the bottom of this page (also can be used
to change other email options):
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/nafex

File attachments are NOT stripped by this list.
TAKE STEPS TO PROTECT YOURSELF FROM COMPUTER VIRUSES!
Please do not send binary files.
Use plain text ONLY in emails!

NAFEX web site: http://www.nafex.org/





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page