Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

nafex - Re: [NAFEX] Mulberry ID,winter buds

nafex@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: North American Fruit Explorers mailing list at ibiblio

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Dave Griffin" <griffingardens@earthlink.net>
  • To: "North American Fruit Explorers" <nafex@lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [NAFEX] Mulberry ID,winter buds
  • Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:02:37 -0600

Lucky,
Argh! the USDA plant database shows rubra with shiny leaves, the opposite
of the VT site listed below.
http://plants.usda.gov/cgi_bin/topics.cgi?earl=plant_profile.cgi&symbol=MOAL
&photoID=moal_001_avd.tif
It does seem that alba is the big problem rather than rubra. Maybe nigra is
the best answer - hardy to zone 6 only. There are plenty of red cedars in
old fields around here already and a lot of the farmers and fathers-in-law
are pretty good shots.
I'll gather a few buds next trip to town.

Dave


> [Original Message]
> From: Lucky Pittman <lucky.pittman@murraystate.edu>
> To: North American Fruit Explorers <nafex@lists.ibiblio.org>
> Date: 2/15/05 8:48:30 AM
> Subject: Re: [NAFEX] Mulberry ID,winter buds
>
> At 08:53 AM 2/15/2005 -0500, you wrote:
> >Dave,
> > This time a year the size of the buds are a good indicator. Rubra
buds are
> >5-7mm long.Alba are 2-4mm long.
> Here's a couple of ID pages
>
> M.rubra - http://www.cnr.vt.edu/dendro/dendrology/syllabus/mrubra.htm
>
http://rnrstreamer.lsu.edu/ecosystems/webtour/species/redmulberry/redmulberr
y.htm
>
> Can't readily find one that has good photos of M.alba to allow
> differentiation from M.rubra - particularly with respect to bud
morphology,
> though I did run across some with misinformation - particularly regarding
> fruit color.
>
> Leaf morphology is usually pretty reliable - M.alba leaves are
> glossy/shiny, whereas M.rubra leaves are rough/sandpapery.
>
> In town here, M.alba is everywhere - in roadside ditches, fencelines,
> cracks in the pavement, etc., but once you get out into the country,
> M.rubra is more evident - mostly along roadsides and wood's edges, but
also
> scattered throughout the woods; nowhere is it exceptionally common, and
it
> would be a major stretch to classify M.rubra as 'invasive'.
>
> Lucky
>
> _______________________________________________
> nafex mailing list
> nafex@lists.ibiblio.org
>
> **YOU MUST BE SUBSCRIBED TO POST!**
> All other messages are discarded.
> No exceptions.
> ----
> To subscribe or unsubscribe, go to the bottom of this page (also can be
used to change other email options):
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/nafex
>
> File attachments are NOT stripped by this list
> TAKE STEPS TO PROTECT YOURSELF FROM COMPUTER VIRUSES!
> Please do not send binary files.
> Use plain text ONLY in emails!
>
> Message archives are here:
> https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/nafex
>
> NAFEX web site: http://www.nafex.org/






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page