Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

nafex - [nafex] Re: sandwiching

nafex@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: North American Fruit Explorers mailing list at ibiblio

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "edforest2010" <edforest55@hotmail.com>
  • To: nafex@yahoogroups.com
  • Subject: [nafex] Re: sandwiching
  • Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 03:15:15 -0000

Tom,
I think the reason no one has responded is because either no one knows
for sure or because it is a long answer.
Here is what I have learned, for what its worth:
>
> What part of the tree is responsible for dormancy? Roots or
framework, or
> the whole tree?

There are hormones that migrate down the tree in he fall from the tips
of the branches, they are responsible for rooting and, when days get
shorter and cooler, (unless unusually fertilized and watered) I
suspect these hormones also, in addition to controling rooting, signal
the rest of the tree to shut down. (I once saw a stretch of books in
the ag library all dealing with dormancy and leaf absicion, so I may
be naive in my simplicity)

>From memory, I have different takes on the initiators of spring
growth, some have said that the tree can't grow if the roots are
frozen. But one experimentor mulched one tree and left the other
unmulched and they both leafed out at the same time.
But I seem to recall someone saying that both the root temp and
frame/branch temp play a role in determing the wake up time.

Ungrafted ranetkas break bud 10 days later than ungrafted antonovka. I
had some sweet 16 grafted to both ranetka and antonovka. The
rootstock had no influence on the date that Sweet 16 leafed out.
However, on the Sweet 16 grafted to ranetka, ranetka suckers at
the base of the tree leafed out two weeks earlier than the Sweet 16 on
the same tree. So the shoot tips do determine the date of leafing
out. That seems to suggest that there isn't an interplay between the
top and the roots, that they are independent of each other in
signaling dormancy. No matter what roots they were on, they broke bud
at the same time, but as we know, (from the sandwiching phenomenon),
if we change the shoot tips to another cultivar, that leafs out later,
this can definately delay growth in spring.
Seems to me its all up to the shoot tips in signaling spring growth. I
wish we had some expert on this. If no one shows up to clarify this I
will make a note to ask some people at the UW next time I go over to
bother them.
Kevin B
>

> >


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
FREE COLLEGE MONEY
CLICK HERE to search
600,000 scholarships!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/vf6MrB/4m7CAA/ySSFAA/VAOolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->





------------------LIST GUIDELINES----------------------

1) Please sign your posting. Include climate and location information if
relevent.
2) Attached files will be stripped from your messages. Post attachments on
the www.YahooGroups.com website.
3) To unsubscribe send a BLANK message to
nafex-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
4) Include only pertinent comments/questions when replying to a posting and
NOT the entire message (especially if the initial posting was large).

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page