Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

livingontheland - [Livingontheland] NGOs warn of increase in land grabs

livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Healthy soil and sustainable growing

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Tradingpost" <tradingpost@lobo.net>
  • To: livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [Livingontheland] NGOs warn of increase in land grabs
  • Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 19:32:39 -0600


As World Food Day approaches, NGOs warn of increase in land grabs
http://www.opednews.com/articles/As-World-Food-Day-approach-by-Joice-Biazoto-101011-233.html
For OpEdNews: Joice Biazoto October 12, 2010 at 11:37:19

Suppose that, one day, a foreign investor decided to buy a vast tract of
fertile land in the United States, with support of the American government.
Suppose all that is grown or produced in that land, and all profits made,
would be shipped directly overseas. Worse, imagine that those Americans who
had been living off that land for decades, maybe centuries, would be forced
to move and given little to no compensation.

Such an event would undoubtedly spark the anger and outrage of thousands,
if not millions, of Americans. And yet, this scenario is not far from reality
-- only the roles are reversed. American companies have recently been
investing heavily on foreign land, and many involved in the worldwide
struggle against hunger believe that is a cause for concern. What investors
call "agricultural development" is described by critics as "land grabbing,"
which they say undermines food security in developing countries.

As World Food Day approaches, and almost a billion people worldwide
continue to suffer from chronic hunger, dozens of NGOs in the U.S. and abroad
have started calling citizens to action against these controversial business
practices. The Right to Food and Nutrition Watch, a report released last week
by a consortium of 13 international civil society groups in over twenty
countries, denounces the practice of land grabbing as an aggravator of
hunger, depriving the rural poor from access to land and violating their
right to food.

"Land grabbing itself is nothing new -- it has existed for hundreds of
years," says Flavio Valente, secretary general of FIAN International, one of
the publishers of the report. "But recently, the practice of land grabbing
has been intensifying and affecting those who are most vulnerable those who
depend on natural resources for their survival, such as small farmers,
indigenous groups and peasants."

Despite promises of bringing technology to developing countries, creating
jobs and increasing food production, foreign investment hardly ever benefits
local communities because it aims to secure crops and profits for those back
home, the report states.

"Land grabbing distorts markets towards increasingly concentrated
agribusiness interests and global trade rather than sustainable peasant
agriculture for local and national markets," says Sofia Monsalve Suárez, land
program coordinator at FIAN International.

The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) estimates
20 million hectares have been acquired by foreign interests in Africa alone.
A field study conducted by FIAN in Ethiopia found that the equivalent of up
to twenty percent of the country's arable land have been bought by or made
available to foreign investors. The Ethiopian minister of agriculture
reportedly declared that herders making use of such land for pasture would
not be compensated, and should go somewhere else.

American companies are among those making land deals in Africa. An American
investor, New-York-based Jarch Capital, bought an area the size of Dubai from
a warlord in South Sudan last year, and Dominion Farms Ltd., which bought a
swampland in Kenya in 2003 to turn it into a rice plantation, has been
reported to intentionally flood local farms to force them to relocate.
However, FIAN reports most deals are surrounded by secrecy, and many
investors' identities remain unknown.

According to the UN Conference on Trade and Development, the United States is
the largest foreign direct investor in agriculture, followed by Canada and
China. In many cases, such investments do not prioritize food production.
John Peck, executive director of Family Farm Defenders, a non-profit in
Madison, Wisconsin which fights against corporate land takeovers in the U.S.,
says there is a „huge trend" of American investors buying land in developing
countries because of the agrofuel boom and of environmental regulations.
"American companies are looking for carbon credits, so they buy farmland in
the global South, because it's cheaper," he says.

But Peck argues that Americans do not need to go overseas to see the harmful
effects of land grabbing. He says American farmers are going bankrupt
everyday, and some are even committing suicide.

"With the financial and food crises, many farms have been foreclosed, and
financial institutions inherit the land to speculate with," he says. "They
are using the land as collateral for hedge funds and buying farmland in hopes
to sell it at higher value -- the goal is not to produce food."

Control mechanisms needed

Food security advocates say that even initiatives being touted as presenting
solutions to the land-grabbing problem, such as the World Bank's Principles
for Responsible Agricultural Development, fail to address the lack of
concrete mechanisms to hold companies and governments accountable. "These
principles, which are meant to be voluntary and self-regulated by the private
sector, distract from the fact that what is needed is mandatory and strict
state regulation of investors in several policy fields, such as financial
markets and agriculture," says Suárez.

Several mechanisms intended to regulate foreign land acquisition already
exist, but are ineffective and weak due to pressures from the economic
sector, Valente says. But he is hopeful when it comes to the Committee on
World Food Security (CFS), a United Nations organ which was reformed last
year and has since become more inclusive, incorporating voices from civil
society, small farmers and indigenous peoples into the decision-making
process.

"The CFS is the best mechanism in place today, because it is the only with a
clear mandate to uphold food security, and each country gets one vote,"
Valente says. "Facilitating the participation of those most affected was the
first step; now we must see if those voices will actually be heard."






  • [Livingontheland] NGOs warn of increase in land grabs, Tradingpost, 10/13/2010

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page