Healthy soil and sustainable growing

[<pbunch@cox.net>]

I agree completely. No significant change will take place if this kind of 
important information only circulates within a small group of people "in the 
know." IMHO the "unwashed hoards" are really the most important audience and 
the message has to get to them through the big media like MSN. 

  
---- Pete Vukovich <pvukovic1@yahoo.com> wrote: 
> Actually the fact that its being published is good. The USDA admitted this 
> about 2 years ago, but nobody reads USDA research papers, and 20 years ago 
> numerous publications came out which suggested that not only GMO foods, but 
> many if not most f2 hybrids have also sacrificed trace mineral content for 
> extra size and starch. 
> 
> If enough mainstream articles come out that suggest that GMO's and modern 
> hybrids aren't cutting it , it help shore up heirloom/open pollinated sales 
> quite a bit. These sorts of articles are typically countered with industry 
> propaganda which says their new hybrids/GMO's are no different, but having 
> the debate return will hopefully raise new eyebrows.
> 
> 
> 
> --- On Tue, 7/13/10, pbunch@cox.net <pbunch@cox.net> wrote:
> 
> From: pbunch@cox.net <pbunch@cox.net>
> Subject: [Livingontheland] Declining Nutritional Values
> To: "livingontheland" <livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org>
> Date: Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 10:24 AM
> 
> Not good.
> 
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37396355/ns/health-diet_and_nutrition/
> 
> Phil Bunch
> Piedras Blancas/Medellin
> _______________________________________________
> Livingontheland mailing list
> Livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/livingontheland
> 
> 
> 
>