livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Healthy soil and sustainable growing
List archive
- From: "Tradingpost" <tradingpost@lobo.net>
- To: livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [Livingontheland] locavorism more expensive?
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:28:53 -0700
I've held off bringing this up before.
I happen to agree about the meat and dairy comment. But there is a problem.
It's clumsy to reply to a message people can't see, because it's in an
attachment that doesn't follow the reply. Like this one. Further, attachments
are scrubbed in the digest some readers get. They never see the message.
Others do this too. It can't be hard to reply in the body of a message.
paul tradingpost@lobo.net
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 3/16/2010 at 1:58 PM realfood@wonderfulfarm.com wrote:
-
Re: [Livingontheland] locavorism more expensive?,
dan conine, 03/15/2010
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [Livingontheland] locavorism more expensive?,
realfood, 03/16/2010
- Re: [Livingontheland] locavorism more expensive?, Tradingpost, 03/16/2010
-
Message not available
- Re: [Livingontheland] locavorism more expensive?, pete, 03/17/2010
-
Re: [Livingontheland] locavorism more expensive?,
realfood, 03/17/2010
- Re: [Livingontheland] locavorism more expensive?, Tradingpost, 03/17/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.