Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

livingontheland - [Livingontheland] The High Cost of Cheap Food

livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Healthy soil and sustainable growing

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Tradingpost" <tradingpost@lobo.net>
  • To: livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [Livingontheland] The High Cost of Cheap Food
  • Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:28:06 -0600


The High Cost of Cheap Food
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/07/20-13
by Megan Nix
Published on Monday, July 20, 2009 by Denver Post

I used to find Flaming Hot Cheetos, bagged pickles, and the occasional plate
of fried chicken in my classroom when I taught Senior English in Louisiana.

I allowed some of my students to eat at their desks after lunch. I had to;
there were three pregnant seniors in my fourth period.

Shayna, who was in her third trimester during her last semester of high
school, mostly snacked on packets of those horribly orange peanut butter
crackers. Over half of my class was obese. After pizza or macaroni or
hamburgers from the cafeteria, they'd fall asleep against their will, come
to, apologize, then nod off again.

My students were kids who carried iPhones and wore brand-name shoes. Eighty
percent were black, 98 percent were low-income. They'd been raised to look as
good as they could, but eat as cheaply as possible.

For awhile, you can ignore poverty in schools, outbreaks of cookie dough E.
coli, and the fact that 27 percent of our country's children are obese. But
they're all connected — and these layers of bad news will eventually weigh
one down.

I found this statistic a little harder to overlook: For the first time in 200
years, today's children have a lower life expectancy than their parents.

Unhealthy school lunches are certainly one reason. Here's another: Most of
our food comes from huge factory farms that are government-subsidized to
produce food products quickly but not nutritiously.

A partial list of Health and Human Service's recalled foods so far this
summer include:

• Lewis Laboratories' chocolate flavor nutrition drink;

• C.F. Sauer gravies and sauce mixes;

• Publix Brand chocolate and vanilla whey protein;

• Malt-o-Meal Maple & Brown Sugar; and

• Three types of seasonings from Kroger.

There aren't any unfamiliar family names up there because smaller, organic
farms abide by the rules of nature: You are stewards of your stock; you allow
the soil to regenerate; and you don't add dry milk and MSG to everything,
then recall it a month later. You learn the names of the plants you're
eating, and you connect a chicken sandwich to a living thing with feathers —
something the fifth- grade students I worked with couldn't do. The bigger
farms are the ones responsible for the litany of gone-wrong products.

The most recent "good news" is that the FDA is pushing for "preventative
process controls" through the Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009 (HR 875)
and the Food Safety Enhancement Act (HR 2749), in order "to protect the
public health by preventing food-borne illness and ensuring the safety of
food." Problem is, the process controls the government will deem as necessary
will likely be too expensive for small organic farmers who are doing more to
keep this country healthy than the huge agribusiness companies (Tyson,
Sedexho, Hormel) who can buy bigger freezers and continue to sell nicely
wrapped crap.

What the passing of HR 875 and 2749 could mean is a loss of organic,
small-farm options and a reduction of both the shopper's autonomy and the
good things that are happening in the food world today.

Endangered are farmers' markets, Community Supported Agriculture, and
programs like the Farm to Cafeteria initiative, which fills cafeterias with
fresh heads of lettuce and teaches kids that accountability can mean
nurturing little green lives. These programs banish the resentment often
extended toward the gourmet, neo-hippie organic movement. Supplying
cafeterias with local organic food isn't fancy; it's cheaper than skipping
lunch. In the long run, our tax dollars wouldn't subsidize the petroleum that
keep factories surging, trucks transporting our tomatoes, and our health
insurance bills skyrocketing.

In the long run, I would like for Shayna's little girl to have a banana when
she's hungry in the afternoon and dirty fingernails from digging in a garden,
not a chin covered in garish orange crumbs.

Are these aspirations likely? One in three children today will develop Type 2
diabetes (one in two if they're black or Hispanic). It's partly because we
aren't eating diversified foods anymore, and the FDA's new plans to protect
factory farms will ensure that we continue to eat a fairly homogenized diet
of refined sugars.

According to Vandana Shiva, an Indian crop ecologist quoted in Barbara
Kingsolver's book "Animal, Vegetable, Miracle," over the course of history,
humans have consumed over 80,000 plant species. That number has now been
reduced to eight species, with a continuous honing in on modified canola,
corn and soy.

When Kingsolver wrote the book in 2007, only six companies controlled 98
percent of the world's seed sales (Monsanto, Syngenta, DuPont, Mitsui,
Aventis, and Dow), and they continue to desecrate land. Juggernauts like
Monsanto send 330 small farm operators off their land a week.

In a nutshell, government regulations will soon favor genetically modified
(or GMO) seeds over organic seeds, and organic seeds might eventually become
illegal.

Hand-planted kale and preservative-less poultry might be things of the past.
The FDA says requiring eggs to be kept at 45 degrees will make us healthier,
but I've owned chickens, and their eggs are like silk when it's 60 and sunny.

The standard that food providers should be held to is purity of process and
intent. We don't need to add bad things to our food. Agribusiness doesn't
promote food safety, it swells with immoral shortcuts (a thousand chickens in
a bedroom- sized space, soil made prematurely infertile, etc.).

What we need to do is take a good, hard look at what "safe" means.

Take a garden. Plant what grows best in your sun. Water the leaves, the
roots. Walk through your rows. (If you don't have a yard, that's what urban
gardens are for.)

Now take another garden. Grow it long and wide, cutting away the ecosystems
along its edges. Decimate the birds and the bugs. Spray it with regulatory
chemicals to ward off the changes provided by the wind and the rain, the
nutrient highways for our food.

Which one would you call "safe"?

I tried to teach my kids how to write, but I also told them what I'd learned:
that an adult needs eight hours of sleep, that homemade bread and
hand-written letters are second to none. That, as Annie Dillard said, "How we
spend our days is, of course, how we spend our years."

On a more human level, the current statistics mean that less of our kids'
days are spent learning, whisk in hand, how their grandma's wrist turned
yolks in a bowl. We are unaccustomed to bugs in our lettuce, fish with heads,
berries covered in the harvest's dust.

The situation here is honest food; the deeper story is our respect for human
life. Lose the first, and you lose the second, too.

I might not have much to hand down to my kids (when I have them). But I do
have a recipe for sweet potato bread and a dad whose knees are muddy all
summer long from gardening. I'd like to give my children shiny vegetables,
basil that leans into the sun, and teach them how to smell a crust that's
done. If the worsening economy means our kids might inherit less, then we
should be giving them longer lives to live.






  • [Livingontheland] The High Cost of Cheap Food, Tradingpost, 07/22/2009

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page