internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: "Alan MacHett" <machett AT ibiblio.org>
- To: internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] (dis` af fect' ed) adj.
- Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 14:56:23 -0400 (EDT)
ah-ha. more of a linguistic study, then, not just denotation. that makes
sense.
-A
In reference to Don Rua's message:
> Actually, I use www.dictionary.com in lieu of a paper dictionary often,
> perhaps at a price. [Anything I can find online is easier than unplugging
> myself from the Matrix.] But popping something into Google brings insights
> into usage that you can't easily get elsewhere. It points to blogs,
> powerpoint presentations, newsgroups, and any number of sources from our
> diverse culture. A print dictionary can present the formal structure, but
> cannot compete with the speed at which language is being tossed about.
>
-
[internetworkers] patently ridiculous,
Sil Greene, 10/01/2004
-
[internetworkers] Disaffected muslim,
Don Rua, 10/03/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] (dis` af fect' ed) adj.,
Alan MacHett, 10/03/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] (dis` af fect' ed) adj.,
Don Rua, 10/03/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] (dis` af fect' ed) adj., Alan MacHett, 10/03/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] (dis` af fect' ed) adj.,
Don Rua, 10/03/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] (dis` af fect' ed) adj.,
Alan MacHett, 10/03/2004
-
[internetworkers] Disaffected muslim,
Don Rua, 10/03/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.