internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...]
- From: matusiak <dave AT matusiak.org>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...]
- Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 11:52:17 -0400
On Jul 6, 2004, at 10:49 AM, Marcia wrote:
I don't know much about the jury selection process
Me neither, and my guess is, neither do they!
I was called for jury duty last year, but I'm not a US citizen! I'm a legal
resident, and a tax payer, so I thought since I may need the justice system
some day, they could ask me to serve it too. But I did call first, to make
sure.
The lady told me I didn't have to go, the "invitation" had been a mistake. So
I asked where they got my name from, and she said they get people's names when
they register to vote.. so I said I'd never registered to vote, I can't vote
here! She didn't know what to say.
Marcia
They must have gotten your information from the InterNetWorkers list.
I mean, heh, "Where else could they have gotten it from?!?!?!"
d ;)
Quoting Jim Allman <jim AT ibang.com>:
On Jul 6, 2004, at 9:47 AM, Shea Tisdale wrote:
For at least 4 of the people on
that jury, that meant making a decision that would find their employer
guilty. And in 2 cases, that entity was the major client of a business
owned or operated by the juror. So even with some concern for
potential
reprisal, they made the decision they felt was appropriate given the
facts
of the case.
Interest. I don't know much about the jury selection process, but I
would've guessed these people would be ineligible due to conflicts of
interest.
=jimA=
Sounds like jury/judge tampering to me...
-
Re: [internetworkers] [rant] legal outrage, setback for rape vic's
, (continued)
- Re: [internetworkers] [rant] legal outrage, setback for rape vic's, DonBartholf, 07/01/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] [rant] legal outrage, setback for rape vic's,
B, 07/01/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Alan MacHett, 07/01/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Tanner Lovelace, 07/01/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Steven Champeon, 07/02/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...], Don Rua, 07/02/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Shea Tisdale, 07/06/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...], zman, 07/06/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Jim Allman, 07/06/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...], Marcia, 07/06/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...], matusiak, 07/06/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...], Steven Champeon, 07/06/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...], Shea Tisdale, 07/06/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Steven Champeon, 07/02/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Tanner Lovelace, 07/01/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Alan MacHett, 07/01/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.